Thursday, October 15, 2026

Dundor and Blixem! Early reprinting of "A Visit from St. Nicholas" in the Missouri REPUBLICAN

Ho ho ho! 🎅🎅🎅 After renewing my subscription to newspapers.com I was immediately rewarded when my search for the phrase "settled our brains" in 19th century papers before 1860 yielded a very early appearance of "A Visit from St. Nicholas" in the Missouri Republican for February 2, 1824. 🎁 

Reprinted "From the Troy Sentinel" (December 23, 1823) under the major heading "Selected Poetry," this previously unrecorded western version includes the original preface by Sentinel editor Orville Holley and generally follows the Sentinel text, more closely than the earlier reprinting in the Charleston Mercury (January 16, 1824) that introduced variant forms such as a singular "hope" (instead of "hopes") in the fourth line and "nested" (instead of "nestled") in the fifth. One change unique to the Missouri version (compared with other early reprintings) has the children's stockings "hanging" instead of "hung" by the chimney with care. Another noteworthy departure from the Sentinel base-text in the Missouri version occurs in the roll of reindeer names. Instead of "Dunder and Blixem" the Republican gives "Dundor and Blixem." Probably a typesetting error, unless they liked the ring of "Dundor" better than "Dunder" in old St. Louis. 

Both forms, hanging and Dundor, occur in one other version I have found, the "Account of a Visit from St. Nicholas" in the Little Rock, Arkansas Gazette for December 25, 1827. Like the 1824 Missouri version, the 1827 Arkansas version also reprints the editorial preface, "From the Troy Sentinel." Evidently the Arkansas version was not copied directly from the Troy original, but from the Missouri Republican or similar text with stockings "hanging" rather than "hung," and "Dundor" (not "Dunder") flying with Blixem.

A Merry Christmas. 1909 postcard via NYPL Digital Collections

Along with earlier reprintings from the Troy Sentinel in Philadelphia, Salem, Hartford, Cooperstown, Norwich, and Charleston, and the later reprinting in Arkansas, the St. Louis version transcribed below is not listed in the glorious compendium by Nancy H. Marshall, The Night Before Christmas: A Descriptive Bibliography of Clement Clarke Moore's Immortal Poem (New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2002). 

Let's don't forget to pencil in the following items, somewhere near the start of Marshall's indispensable BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRIES on page 3:

  • Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). Tuesday, December 30, 1823, p. 2, col. 6. 
  • Essex Register (Salem, MA). Monday, January 5, 1824, p. 4, col. 1. 
  • Connecticut Mirror (Hartford, CT). Monday, January 5, 1824, p. 3, col. 1.
  • The Watch-Tower (Coooperstown, NY). Monday, January 12, 1824, p. 3, col. 3.
  • Norwich Courier (Norwich, CT). Wednesday, January 14, 1824, p. 4, col. 1.
  • Charleston Mercury (Charleston, SC). Friday, January 16, 1824, p. 2, col. 5.
  • Missouri Republican (St. Louis, MO). Monday, February 2, 1824, p. 4, col. 1. 
  • Arkansas Gazette (Little Rock, AR). Tuesday, December 25, 1827, p. 4, col. 1.

In 1824 the Missouri Republican was still a weekly newspaper, published in St. Louis by Edward Charless and edited by Josiah Spalding (1793-1852), a Yale grad and lawyer in St. Louis.  

Missouri Republican - April 9, 1823

Newly made a stepfather through his marriage (in April of the previous year) to the widow Mrs. Agnes P. Gay, a local schoolteacher with two children, Spalding now had the best of reasons to like and promote the delightful rhymes about Santa Claus, as well as the family oriented preface by Orville L. Holley that accompanied the first printing of "A Visit from St. Nicholas." 

Who wrote it was still a mystery. The Christmas poet's identity would not formally be revealed to the public at large until 1837, when four poems by a highly respected professor of Hebrew named Clement C. Moore including "A Visit From St. Nicholas" appeared under Moore's name in the New-York Book of Poetry, edited by Charles Fenno Hoffman (New York: George Dearborn, 1837). A few years later, responding to a false claim of authorship (quickly retracted) in the Washington, D.C. National Intelligencer, Dr. Moore explained in a letter to the editor of the New York American (there published on March 1, 1844) that he had composed "some lines, describing a visit from St. Nicholas" many years before, intended "not for publication, but to amuse my children." 

As indicated on Newspapers.com, files of the Missouri Republican are made available courtesy of the State Historical Society of Missouri. 

A Visit from St. Nicholas A Visit from St. Nicholas Feb 2, 1824 The Missouri Republican (St. Louis, Missouri) Newspapers.com

ACCOUNT OF A VISIT FROM ST. NICHOLAS

'Twas the night before Christmas, when all thro' the house,
Not a creature was stirring not even a mouse; 
The stockings were hanging by the chimney with care
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds
While visions of sugar plums danc'd at their heads,
And Mama in her 'kerchief, and I in my cap
Had just settled our brains for a long winter's nap--
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter.
I sprung from the bed to see what was the matter,
Away to the window I flew like a flash.
Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash
The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow,
Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below;
When, what to my wondering eyes should appear, 
But a miniature sleigh, and eight timy rein deer,
With a little old driver, so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick,
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and call'd them by name
"Now Dasher now! Dancer, now Prancer and Vixen
"On Comet on! Cupid, on! Dundor and Blixem;
"To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall!
"Now dash away! dash away! dash away all!"
As dry leaves before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky
So up to the house top the coursers they flew,
With the sleigh full of Toys--and St. Nicholas too
And then in a twinkling I heard on the roof
The prancing and pawing of each little hoof, 
As I drew in my head and was turning around,
Down the chimney St Nicholas came with a bound. 
He was dress'd all in fur, from his head to his foot
And his cloaths were all tarnish'd with ashes and soot;
A bundle of toys was flung on his back,
And he look'd like a pedlar just opening his pack
His eyes--how they twinkled! his dimples how merry,
His cheeks were like roses his nose like a cherry,
His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow
And the beard of his chin was as white as the snow;
The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth
And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath
He had a broad face and a little round belly
That shook when he laughed like a bowl full of jelly;
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf,
And I laughed when I saw him inspite of myself
A wink of his eye and a twist of his head
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread,
He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work;
And fill'd all the stockings, then turn'd with a jirk,
And laying his finger aside of his nose
And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose.
He sprung to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle,
And away they all flew like the down [dawn?] of a thistle
But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight--
Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night

Related posts

Saturday, October 10, 2026

James C. Welling's promotion to co-editor of the NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER, full text of the published 1860 announcement by William W. Seaton

J. C. Welling via Library of Congress

Herein I am pleased to give the complete text of the 1860 editorial by William Winston Seaton (1785-1866), officially making James Clarke Welling (1825-1894) co-editor of the Washington, D.C. National Intelligencer after the death of Joseph Gales, Jr. (1786-1860), Seaton's brother-in-law and business partner. The National Intelligencer was an influential Whig newspaper that embraced conservative, pro-Union values up to and through the American Civil War. Issued only months before the election of Abraham Lincoln as president of the United States, amid the intense and growing secession crisis, Seaton's "Editorial Announcement" on August 30, 1860 affirmed the newspaper's guiding principles and determination "to hold the Union of the States as the basis of their peace and happiness" and "to support the Constitution, which is the cement of the Union, as well in its limitations as in its authorities." Welling, already an accomplished educator and journalist, would go on to have a distinguished career after the war as president of Columbian College, now the George Washington University. As amply attested by friends and colleagues at the memorial service held after his death, James Clarke Welling became a leading member of numerous organizations devoted to supporting the arts and sciences, including the Smithsonian Institution and National Geographic Society.

Seaton's formal statement of Welling's well-deserved promotion first appeared on page 3 of the Daily National Intelligencer for Thursday, August 30, 1860. Abridged versions circulated widely thereafter in American newspapers North and South. 

https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83026172/1860-08-30/ed-1/?sp=3&r=-0.053,0.039,0.387,0.161,0

Of particular importance for Melville studies is the disclosure of Welling's employment history as literary editor of the National Intelligencer. With gratifying specificity, Welling is credited with writing the highly regarded "Notes on New Books" column since the departure (no later than March 1851) of Edward William Johnston (1799-1867). 

Washington City Southern Press - March 15, 1851
via genealogybank.com

As announced in the Southern Press of March 15, 1851, "Edward W. Johnston, esq., of Washington, formerly of Virginia, has become one of the proprietors of the Richmond Whig, and will in a few weeks take charge of the editorial department of the paper." Having served for a decade as literary editor before Welling replaced him, Edward W. Johnston (an older brother of Joseph Eggleston Johnston, the Confederate general) most likely wrote the generous notice of Melville's first two books that appeared in the National Intelligencer on May 27, 1847; reprinted in Herman Melville: The Contemporary Reviews, edited by Brian Higgins and Hershel Parker (Cambridge University Press, 1995) at pages 72-75 (Typee) and 114-115; 118-119 (Omoo).

According to the timeline "for the last ten years" provided by Seaton in August 1860, Welling's tenure as literary editor and author of "Notes on New Books" must have begun seven or eight months before the long and laudatory review of Moby-Dick appeared on December 16, 1851 in the "Notes on New Books" column of the Daily National Intelligencer. Seaton's announcement thus provides strong evidence for Welling's authorship of this mostly positive and impressively erudite American notice of Moby-Dick, mistakenly attributed in previous Melville scholarship to William Allan Butler. 

The notably "imposing" review of Moby-Dick in the National Intelligencer was first ascribed to William A. Butler, cautiously and carefully, by Hugh W. Hetherington in his chapter on "Early Reviews of Moby-Dick" for the collection of Moby-Dick Centennial Essays, edited by Tyrus Hillway and Luther S. Mansfield (Southern Methodist University Press, 1953) at page 106. However, after Perry Miller endorsed the suggestion in his brilliant Raven and the Whale, Hetherington reiterated his erroneous guess in Melville's Reviewers: British and American (University of North Carolina Press, 1961) at pages 214-215, presenting the formerly tentative ascription to Butler as "very likely." 

Hetherington's mistake, later amplified by Hershel Parker, apparently resulted from confusion about the title and typical content of pseudonymous contributions to the National Intelligencer in 1850 and 1851 by the genial lawyer-poet William Allen Butler. Hetherington, Perry Miller, and Parker after them wrongly conflated Butler's light and breezy "Notices of New Books," serially published in the National Intelligencer over the pen-name "Jacques du Monde," with the weightier reviews in the "Notes on New Books" column that James C. Welling began furnishing in June 1851 at the latest, a month or two after the previous literary editor, Edward W. Johnston, left to conduct the Richmond Whig. Butler, the good friend of Evert and George Duyckinck, was by his own admission only ever an "occasional correspondent" of the Washington National Intelligencer; as revealed in William Allen Butler, A Retrospect of Forty Years, 1825-1865, edited by his daughter Harriet Allen Butler (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1911) page 234. 

As Welling himself recalled in the last year of his life: 

"I was the Literary Editor of the old National Intelligencer before I assumed its political conduct in the year 1858."

-- Quoted from a letter dated February 12, 1894 and partially printed in The Nation on September 13, 1894.

Given that his tenure as literary editor extended well past 1856, James C. Welling also can reasonably be credited with writing the review of Leaves of Grass that appeared in the "Notes on New Books" section of the National Intelligencer on February 18, 1856. This gently mocking response to Walt Whitman, as pointed out by Hershel Parker in the 3rd Norton Critical Edition of Moby-Dick (footnote 4, page 607), employed the same arresting phrase "sinuosities of thought" previously used in the more favorable review of Moby-Dick (National Intelligencer, December 16, 1851). While praising Whitman's "wonderful powers of description and of word-painting" Welling could not follow the airier "transcendental sinuosities of thought" he encountered in Leaves of Grass. Similarly elusive, Melville's "sinuosities of a thought" in Moby-Dick reached "depths of pathos that few can fathom." However, as Welling perceived them in 1851, Melville's winding ways of thinking and writing brought the reader somewhere worth getting to; whereas Whitman's twisted thought-trails (like Emerson's philosophy according to Longfellow) disappointingly "dwindle to a squirrel path and run up a tree." 

Here is the formal statement in which William W. Seaton positively identified his co-editor James C. Welling as literary editor and author of "Notes on New Books" after the departure of Edward William Johnston ten years before; transcribed below from the Daily National Intelligencer of August 30, 1860.

Washington Daily National Intelligencer - August 30, 1860
via genealogybank.com

 EDITORIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

As the surviving Editor of the National Intelligencer, I have to announce that Mr. JAMES C. WELLING will hereafter be associated with me in the editorial conduct of this journal. In making this announcement it is proper to state that Mr. WELLING is no stranger to the columns of the Intelligencer, having been, in different capacities, connected with it for the last ten years, during the first five of which, after the retirement of the accomplished EDWARD WILLIAM JOHNSTON from the Literary department of the paper, Mr. WELLING had charge of it, and was the author of those "Notes on New Books," which, by the scholarship and ability evinced in their composition, would, of themselves, be a sufficient evidence of the qualifications he brings to the tasks of journalism. But it is just to add that during the last five years he has participated in all the duties incident to the editorship of this journal, and has thus served a noviciate quite long enough to give full proof of his vocation to the exacting career upon which he has entered. Enjoying during this period, in the fullest degree, the confidence of my late lamented colleague, Mr. GALES, he has equally, by his high moral and conscientious character, no less than by his rare attainments, merited my own; and I avail myself of his temporary absence from Washington to make this announcement to the patrons whom it is the honor of the Intelligencer to address. 

It is hardly necessary, either in view of this announcement, or of the irreparable bereavement which the paper has recently sustained, for me to state that the principles and aims of the National Intelligencer will undergo no change whatever; on the contrary, it will, in all respects, continue to pursue the path which it has undeviatingly trod throughout its previous course. If indeed the occasion required of me a renewed declaration of the principles by which the journal will be guided, I could but repeat what it was deemed fitting, some years ago, at an epoch in its history, to avow, and in which revolving years have made no change, viz:  That in Politics the paper would continue to be Constitutional and Conservative; to hold the true objects of a just administration of this Government to be, to cherish peace and friendly intercourse with all foreign nations having correspondent dispositions; to scrupulously avoid all interference with the domestic or internal affairs of other nations; to maintain sincere neutrality towards belligerent Powers; to prefer in all cases amicable discussion and reasonable accommodation of differences to a decision of them by appeals to arms; to hold the Union of the States as the basis of their peace and happiness; to support the Constitution, which is the cement of the Union, as well in its limitations as in its authorities; to respect the rights and authorities reserved to the States and to the People as equally incorporated with, and essential to the success of the general system; to avoid the slightest interference with the rights of conscience or the functions of religion, so wisely exempted from civil jurisdiction; to preserve, in their full energy, the other salutary provisions in behalf of private and personal rights, and of the freedom of the press; to provide and maintain an adequate regular military force, and a respectable and efficient navy; to promote, by authorized means, improvements friendly to agriculture, to manufactures, and to external and internal commerce; and to favor, in like manner, the advancement of science and the diffusion of information as the best aliment to true liberty. 

Such have been the objects which, for near fifty years, the NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER has endeavored to promote, in every proper way, and will continue steadily to advocate. 

WM. W. SEATON.

Related posts

Friday, October 9, 2026

Reviving Melville before the "Melville Revival"

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK


Rediscovering De Berard’s condensed “Epic of the Whale,” Critical Synopsis, and Melville bio in Volume 2 of the “Classic Library” (1902) and “Classic Tales” (1905) anthologies 

Portrait of Frederick B. De Berard.
Source: Classic Tales by Famous Authors Vol. 1
(New York: The Bodleian Society, 1905)

👉 First published on Substack, reposted here since I am keen to put into the mix of accessible, searchable data the actual words used by anthologist and unabashed bibliophile Frederick Brigham De Berard in praise of Melville and Moby-Dick. Not that De Berard was alone in recording his high estimation of Melville's writings, only two years into the new 20th century. Edwin Monroe Bacon devoted five pages to Melville as one of the "Famous Makers of American Literature" profiled in Literary Pilgrimages in New England (Silver, Burdett & Company, 1902) on pages 451-456. Bacon creatively fashioned the section on Melville in Berkshire County, Mass. as a dialogue with local Pittsfield expert "Mrs. H. M. Plunkett" = Harriette Merrick Hodge Plunkett, the well-known health advocate and journalist.

" 'Moby Dick' has been called the most dramatic and imaginative of his works. In his later writings he was much given to speculative philosophy, and his popularity waned.... Notwithstanding his remarkable adventures and sea-faring life, there was nothing of the jovial, breezy air of the sailor about him. He had more the gentle carriage of the student, the manner of the man of books. He was more than Dana a pioneer of our sea-story writers, and in his best works set a pace not easy for his successors to follow. His picturesque style came through his excellent training in English composition, to which he showed an aptitude in his youth, and from his early reading of the masters of English literature."

-- Literary Pilgrimages, page 456 https://archive.org/details/literarypilgrima00bacorich/page/456/mode/2up

By 1905 numerous surveys of American Literature counted Moby Dick as an important work, in some way worthy of attention in this fresh field of study. Granted, some early efforts happily classified Melville with "lesser writers" or "minor writers." Necessarily, the elevation of Melville's status to Giant of American Letters would take time, and the concentrated efforts of exceptionally competent academics--at Columbia University during the 1920's "Melville Revival," and later at Yale, under the tutelage of Stanley T. Williams. Nevertheless, Moby-Dick got respectful attention in numerous textbooks published between 1891 and 1905, including the following titles:

  • Julian Hawthorne and Leonard Lemmon, American Literature: an Elementary Textbook for Use in High Schools and Academies (Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1891). At page 211 rates Moby-Dick "the most powerful of Melville's books." 
  • Alphonso G. Newcomer, American Literature (Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1901) page 128. Ranks Herman Melville as "the most important" of New York "writers of tales of adventure whose scenes were laid on shipboard or in remote quarters of the earth...." Melville "in his youth embarked upon a whaling vessel bound for the Pacific and spent several years, a portion of the time in captivity, among the South Sea Islands. The series of partly fanciful tales founded upon his experiences — Typee (1846 ), Оmоо (1847), Moby Dick, or the White Whale (1851), etc., — had a wide circulation, and an occasional admirer can still be found who will pronounce them superior to Cooper's."
  • Charles Noble, Studies in American Literature (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1898) at pages 287-288. Cites Melville as "our best novelist of travel and sea-life"; Moby-Dick (1851) listed with Mardi (1849), Battle-Pieces and Aspects of the War (1866), and Clarel (1876) as notable literary productions after Typee and Omoo. 
  • Henry S. Pancoast, An Introduction to American Literature (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1898). While this volume contains no substantive discussion of Melville or his writings, Typee and Moby-Dick are duly listed in the Appendix, Table III charting the "Literature of the Republic" c. 1809-1897.

    The perceived slight motivated Albert H. Smyth to point out, as a mistake, "the omission of Herman Melville, in his best books—'Moby Dick', 'Typee', 'Omoo'—one of the best of American writers" in an otherwise favorable review of Pancoast's Introduction, published in the April 1898 issue of The Citizen. 
  • William P. Trent, A History of American Literature, 1607-1865 (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1905). Placing Melville with "The Romancers" on pages 389-391, Trent recognizes Moby-Dick as a "masterpiece," flawed however by "inordinate length" and the bad influence of Carlye (a fault lamented by Melville's earliest critics, some more than fifty years before).

    "Melville's greatest achievement still awaited him, however, for after two other fair books of adventure he published, in 1851, his masterpiece, Moby Dick, or the White Whale. If it were not for its inordinate length, its frequently inartistic heaping up of details, and its obvious imitation of Carlylean tricks of style and construction, this narrative of tremendous power and wide knowledge might be perhaps pronounced the greatest sea story in literature. The breath of the sea is in it and much of the passion and charm of the most venturous of all the venturous callings plied upon the deep. It is a cool reader that does not become almost as eager as the terrible Captain Ahab in his demoniacal pursuit of Moby Dick, the invincible whale, a creation of the imagination not unworthy of a great poet. In this uneven , but on the whole genuine, work of genius, Melville probably overtasked himself...."
  • Mildred Cabell Watkins, American Literature (American Book Company, 1894) page 47. Commends Moby-Dick to young readers as one of Melville's "wildly exciting tales of adventure."
***
Packed with variously diverting tales of the sea, Volume 2 in the 20-volume Classic Library of Famous Literature (New York: The Bodleian Society, 1902) gives Moby-Dick its due, and then some. This particular volume offers a bold abridgement of Herman Melville’s 1851 masterpiece by series editor-arranger Frederick B. De Berard (1853-1927). The editorially condensed version unfolds in twenty-three sections that draw generously from narrative and Ahab-centered chapters of Moby-Dick, casting them collectively as “The Epic of the Whale.” [Fn 1; see below]

Six entertaining pieces by other writers follow the reader-friendly digest of Melville’s whaling “Epic.” Hennig Cohen, the outstanding old-school Melville scholar who (way back in the 1970’s) first discovered De Berard’s high regard for Melville and Moby-Dick, thus described the contents of Volume 2 in a little noticed bibliographical note:

Melville is clearly preëminent among a good and varied company. The other selections, in the order in which they appear, are a melodramatic excerpt on Malay pirates from Hard Cash by Charles Reade and Victor Hugo’s bravura description of the cannon that breaks loose on shipboard from Ninety-Three; two personal narratives, Richard Henry Dana on rounding Cape Horn, and an account of “A Real Shipwreck” in the South Seas in the 1870s by the Earl of Pembroke; and finally, two comic selections, William S. Sullivan’s [Gilbert’s] Bab ballad “The Yarn of the Nancy Bell” and Samuel Lover’s Sketch “Barny O’Reirdon, the Navigator.” [Fn 2]

All seven of the nautical stories in Volume 2, including the condensed “Epic of the Whale,” had previously been collected by De Berard in Famous Tales of the Sea (New York: International Book and Publishing Co., 1899; copyrighted by Isaac H. Blanchard Co.). 

Below are links to digitized texts of the “The Epic of the Whale” in three differently titled anthologies, each edited by Frederick Brigham De Berard and accessible via either Hathi Trust Digital Library 

or the Internet Archive:

As Cohen also found before me, the 1899 set of Famous Tales lacked the impressive editorial apparatus provided in the 1902 Classic Library and 1905 Classic Tales volumes produced in New York by the Bodleian Society (not affiliated with the renowned library in Oxford, England).

The 1902 and 1905 sets contain the same “General Preface” by Frederick B. De Berard and “General Introduction” by Rossiter Johnson, presented sequentially in the front of Volume 1 (featuring stories of “Battle, Camp and Siege”) together with dignified photographic portraits of De Berard and Johnson. Although Rossiter Johnson had personally known and corresponded with Herman Melville, the “General Introduction” that Johnson provided does not specifically mention or identify the author of Moby-Dick alongside other, named American writers including Irving, Poe, Hawthorne, Edward Everett Hale, and Bret Harte. [Fn 3]

De Berard likewise left Melville out of the “General Preface,” although it opens quoting Sir Thomas Browne (one of Melville’s favorite authors) on mutability (one of Melville’s favorite themes). As a good bibliophile should, De Berard fairly revels in the enjoyment of timeless “literature of imagination and fancy—the powerful imaginings of the great romancers and novelists, the beautiful fancies of great poets.” De Berard’s enthusiasm for books and authors, and for a shared culture of reading based on great works of literature, seems boundless. [Fn 4] His remarkably ardent “General Preface” begs for a closer look which I hope to give in a future post.

Here I want to focus on Volume 2 of the Classic Library and Classic Tales anthologies, where De Berard more than made up for the seeming neglect of Melville in Volume 1 by supplying a “Critical Synopsis” of the abridged Moby-Dick and short bio of its author. [Fn 5] Absent from most accounts of the legendary “Melville Revival,” the editorial contributions of Frederick Brigham De Berard deserve a wider circulation and appreciation. To that end, complete texts of the relevant “Critical Synopsis” and “Biographical” entry are given below, transcribed from digital images of Volume 2 in Classic Tales by Famous Authors (1905). Texts in Classic Tales are identical with those in the earlier Classic Library of Famous Literature (1902). For example, the typographical error of “Tmbiguities” for “Ambiguities” appears in both editions.

Enjoy!

CRITICAL SYNOPSIS OF SELECTIONS [ pages iii-iv ]

EPIC OF THE WHALE, THE : BY HERMAN MELVILLE

This is an abstract, or condensation, of the famous book, “Moby Dick; or, the White Whale,” which appeared in the ‘forties. It is one of the most powerful works ever written to depict the reality of a sailor’s life aboard a whaling ship. It is based upon the actual experience of the author, who, curiously enough, combined a taste for roving life of adventure with profound philosophic insight and remarkable literary power. The work is scarcely a story in the ordinary sense, having but a slight thread of plot.

In an encounter with an infuriated sperm whale, the captain of a New England whaling-ship had his leg bitten off and narrowly escaped with his life. Morbid regret was followed by melancholia and finally by monomania. Yearning for vengeance, he devoted his life to a search for the White Whale, “Moby Dick,” by which he had been maimed. For years he sailed in pursuit of his enemy, remaining at sea until his ship became crazy and weather-worn, and his crew were inspired with superstitious dread of the half-mythical monster, of whose very existence they were in doubt. The finding of the great whale, the attack upon it, and the destruction wrought upon boats, ship and crew, are related in the story. This slight and fanciful romance is the foundation for a series of intensely graphic descriptions of whaling life, of the sea and the creatures that dwell therein. The episodes descriptive of the whale and his life are classics of natural history. The accounts of the chase and capture of the mighty cetacean are unrivaled for their dramatic force and powerful diction. The present arrangement includes the narrative portions and those episodes relating directly to whale-life and whaling. 

  

BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF AUTHORS [ x - xi ]

... MELVILLE, HERMAN: Born at New York, August 1, 1819; died in that city, September 28, 1891. This author, comparatively neglected during more than a generation, ranks among the most powerful and original American men-of-letters. He led a roving and adventurous life. As a boy, he “ran away,” to sea, shipping at New Bedford for a whaling voyage, which extended over several years. While ashore on the Marquesas Islands, he and his companion were abandoned by their ship, and were made captive by the natives — a wholly savage race of cannibals. The story of his life as a sailor, his captivity and escape, and his experience as a “beach-comber” in Tahiti, are told in “Typee” (1846), “Omoo” (1847), and “White Jacket, the World in a Man-of-War” (1850). These works are vivid pictures of sea life and adventure; but Melville’s chief title to fame is due to “Moby Dick; or, the White Whale” — a work of great literary distinction, one of the most forceful series of descriptive pictures in the language, and an account of sea life and the mysteries of the deep which stands wholly alone for vividness and actuality. Melville’s other writings are: “Mardi, Etc.’‘ (1849), “Redburn” (1849), “Pierre; or, the Tmbiguities” (1852), several volumes of poems and short stories. He gave public lectures in the years 1857 to 1860; and from 1866 to 1885 was an official in the New York Customs Office. He became morbid in his later years, rigidly secluded himself from the public and all but a few friends, and died a recluse.

CLASSIC TALES BY FAMOUS AUTHORS, ed. Frederick B. De Berard.
Twenty volumes, offered by Kubik Fine Books Ltd. of Dayton, Ohio.

Footnotes

  1. Editor Frederick B. De Berard compiled “The Epic of the Whale” from the following chapters in Moby-Dick; or, The Whale (1851), evidently using some version of the oft reprinted 1892 edition titled Moby Dick or the White Whale and copyrighted by Herman’s widow Elizabeth Shaw Melville: 

    1. The Monomaniac Captain [Chapter 36, The Quarter-Deck]
    2. Moby Dick [41]
    3. The Chase [Chapter 47, The Mat-Maker; and Chapter 48, The First 4. Lowering]
    4. The Line [60]
    5. Stubb Kills a Whale [61]
    6. The Dart [62]
    7. The Crotch [63]
    8. The Sharks [64, Stubb’s Supper]
    9. Cutting In [67]
    10. The Monkey-Rope [72]
    11. The Sperm Whale’s Head [74]
    12. The Battering-Ram [76]
    13. The Great Heidelburgh Tun [77]
    14. The Pequod Meets the Virgin [81]
    15. Pitchpoling [84]
    16. The Tail [86]
    17. The Grand Armada [87]
    18. The Try Works [96]
    19. Stowing Down and Clearing Up [98]
    20. Measurement of the Whale’s Skeleton [103]
    21. The Chase—First Day [133]
    22. The Chase—Second Day [134]
    23. The Chase—Third Day [135] 
  2. Hennig Cohen, “The Famous Tales Anthologies: Recognition of Melville, 1899” in Brodie, Alexander H., et al. “Bibliographical Notes.” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, volume 68, number 2, 1974, pages 63–83. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24302066. Accessed 4 Oct. 2026. In the quoted passage, Cohen incorrectly attributes the “Yarn of Nancy Bell” to “William S. Sullivan,” apparently confusing William S. Gilbert with Gilbert’s composing partner Arthur Sullivan. De Berard’s Famous Tales of the Sea (1899); Classic Library (1902); and Classic Tales (1905) all credit the comic “Yarn” to Gilbert.

    Ignored in the Historical Note for the 1988 Northwestern-Newberry Edition of Moby-Dick, Hennig Cohen’s 1974 find is rarely mentioned in subsequent Melville scolarship. Michael Kearns broke the silence by citing Cohen’s discovery as more good evidence for the popular appeal of Moby-Dick before the academic “Melville Revival.” See Michael Kearns, Writing for the Street, Writing in the Garret: Melville, Dickinson, and Private Publication (The Ohio State University Press, 2010) page 127. Accessible via JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16qk3jw.9 and Project MUSE, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/30/oa_monograph/book/24310/pdf.

  3. For the content of known letters to Rossiter Johnson, see Herman Melville, Correspondence, edited by Lynn Horth (Northwestern University Press, 1993) pages 503-504. <https://books.google.com/books/about/Correspondence.html?id=nBeBBc3m4yYC>

  4. In the role of author F. B. De Berard contributed two pieces of his own to the Classic Library/Classic Tales anthology. Volume 3 includes De Berard’s How They Took the Kashmir Bastion with other “Tales of Heroism”; and Volume 17 places his account of Baldur the Beautiful with "Famous Tales of Gods and Heroes.” Brief as it is, De Berard’s modest author bio in Volume 3 may serve as a helpful starting point for further study: 

    "DE BERARD, FREDERICK B. : Born at Racine, Wis., 1853. A prolific writer during the past twenty-five years, but mainly upon technical subjects and topics of temporary interest. His strictly literary work has been confined to criticisms, reviews and a very few stories and poems. For a number of years he has been occupied with practical studies of economic questions, and particularly with investigations touching taxation and the municipal management of the city of New York."

    <https://archive.org/details/classictalesbyfa03debe/page/n33/mode/2up>

    Born October 4, 1853, Frederick B. De Berard was a son of Frances Julia Merrill and Fredrick William De Berard, a grocer in Racine, Wisconsin. Frederick B. married Anna Mary Collins (Annie) in Chicago on June 4, 1878 and the couple had two children. During the first three decades of the 20th century, De Berard worked for the Merchants’ Association of New York as a statistician and eventually chief researcher. He died of a sudden heart attack at the age of 73, as reported in the Brooklyn Eagle for August 12, 1927:

    "Frederick B. DeBerard of 544 E. 18th St., for 30 years connected with the Merchants Association of New York and regarded as one of the ablest investigators in this city, died Wednesday [August 10, 1927] at Lake Parlin, M[ain]e., where he had been spending the summer. Death was due to heart trouble.

    Mr. DeBerard, who was 73 years old, had been connected with the Merchants Association since it was founded and at the time of his death was director of research for the organization. He was in charge of all its important investigations. He was born in Racine, Wis., and is survived by his widow, Mrs. Annie M. DeBerard; a daughter, Miss Hazel DeBerard, and a son, Willard E. DeBerard. Services will be held in the Fairchild Chapel, 36 Lefferts pl., tomorrow afternoon at 1 o’clock. Interment will be in Kensico Cemetery."

  5. As previously noted by Cohen, two other volumes in the Classical Library and Classic Tales sets also contain writings by Melville: Volume 14 reprints Melville’s short fiction The Bell Tower as one of six “Famous Tales of Enchantment”; and Volume 16 collects “Famous Tales of Barbarians and Savages” including Captive among Cannibals, condensed from passages in the latter half of Melville’s first book, Typee, more specifically chapters 15-19, 30, 32, and 34. Four stories in Volume 16 headed “In the South Seas” are adapted from two collections by Louis Becke (not Typee as stated in Cohen’s 1974 “Note”). De Berard excerpted “Rangers of the Tia Kau” from Becke’s By Reef and Palm (London; T. Fisher Unwin, 1894); while “Ninia,” “At a Kava Drinking,” and “Feast at Pentecost” are from The Ebbing of the Tide: South Sea Stories by Louis Becke (J. B. Lippincott Company, 1896).

Related posts

  • Charles Goodrich Whiting, 1891 memorial article in the Springfield, Mass. Republican
    https://melvilliana.blogspot.com/2016/08/charles-goodrich-whiting-author-of.html

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

I stand with Israel

 

Monday, October 5, 2026

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK by Scott Norsworthy

Rediscovering De Berard’s condensed “Epic of the Whale,” Critical Synopsis, and Melville bio in Volume 2 of the “Classic Library” (1902) and “Classic Tales” (1905) anthologies

Read on Substack

Monday, July 20, 2026

MOBY-DICK in the BEE

 

Friday, July 17, 2026

Project MUSE - Melville’s Star Spangled Banner

Just published in the June 2026 Leviathan, this important essay by Steven Olsen-Smith 
"introduces a newly identified Civil War-era flag inscribed by Herman Melville with his name and New York City address, a material artifact that expands our understanding of the author’s commitment to national identity....Melville acquired the flag no later than the period surrounding the outbreak of war, flying it at Arrowhead before relocating to New York, where he added the ink inscription and continued to use it."
"We'd like to do... Everybody want to stand up this time; everybody must stand up, because "we's all Americans," so forth and so on. We are Americans: you can do this, you can do that. This is for everybody together, that action. We'd like to do the American anthem the way it really is in the air which you breathe every day, the way it really sounds."  
-- Jimi Hendrix, May 30, 1970 Live at Berkeley, 2nd show 10 p.m.

Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Hershel Parker's great "Inside Narrative"

 

Monday, July 6, 2026

Hershel Parker 1935-2026

"Hershel Parker, an American university professor distinguished for his two-volume biography of Herman Melville, died at his home in Morro Bay on June 19, 2026, at the age of ninety." 

https://esterobaynews.com/obituaries/hershel-parker-1935-2026/

 R.I.P. Maestro

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Noticed in North Carolina, "I and My Chimney"

The Starling. Engraving by Andrew Birrell after a drawing by Thomas Stothard. Source: Laurence Sterne, A Sentimental Journey through France and Italy, plate facing page 86 in the 1801 London edition owned by George L. Duyckinck.

About the contemporary reception of "I and My Chimney" there is little to record in the absence of printed commentary.  
-- Merton M. Sealts, Jr., "Melville's Chimney, Reexamined" in Pursuing Melville, 1940-1980 (University of Wisconsin Press, 1982) page 172. 

Here's something new, a rare contemporary take on "I and My Chimney." Without reference to authorship, this favorable and unusually substantive notice of Melville's short story (first published anonymously in the March 1856 issue of Putnam's Monthly Magazine) appeared in the Wilmington, North Carolina Daily Herald for March 11, 1856, in a survey of "Putnam's Monthly" for March contributed "For the Herald" by an unidentified reviewer. At this time the Herald was conducted by Talcottt Burr, Jr. (1819-1858), a talented and highly esteemed editor who died of typhoid fever less than two years later at the home of his father in Wilmington. 

Of particular interest in the North Carolina notice of "I and My Chimney" is the mention of Laurence Sterne's A Sentimental Journey though France and Italy as a likely source or analogue for the narrator's comically affectionate treatment of his chimney as a close friend and confidante. Sterne's Tristram Shandy (Sealts Number 490 in the catalog of books owned and borrowed at Melville's Marginalia Online) had a major influence on the narrative style of Moby-Dick. As Armour Caldwell pointed out in a 1908 lecture at Tulane, Moby-Dick exhibits

"the same perverse disproportion, the same elaborate digressions and the same dramatic dialogue. It abounds with description and philosophizing, and this makes the story rather slow."

Shades of Sterne in the humorous parts of Melville's great whale book had previously been noted by James Clarke Welling in his long and laudatory review of Moby-Dick for the Washington National Intelligencer (December 16, 1851):

The humor of Mr. Melville is of that subdued yet unquenchable nature which spreads such a charm over the pages of Sterne. As illustrative of this quality in his style, we must refer our readers to the irresistibly comic passages scattered at irregular intervals through “Moby Dick."

In connection with "I and My Chimney," the North Carolina reviewer's specific reference to Sterne's Sentimental Journey alludes, I would guess, to the intensely personal lament for a Dead Ass by its grief-struck owner in "Nampont"; and the narrator Yorick's equally famous encounter in "The Captive" with a caged starling, treated as a speaking emblem of imprisonment who pathetically repeats, "I can't get out."

Previously unrecorded in Melville scholarship, the North Carolina notice of "I and My Chimney" is transcribed below from the Wilmington Daily Herald of March 11, 1856.

Wilmington NC Daily Herald - March 11, 1856
via newspapers.com

Putnam's valuable periodical for March is before us, freighted as usual with its rich store of mature thoughts....

"I and My Chimney," is a pleasant, lively, rather humorous sketch, in which one finds no little of "latent philosophy." One may read it and read it again, and still there is something worthy of notice. Like Sterne, in his sentimental journey, the author gravely speaks to and of his "pet chimney;" sympathises with it in all its afflictions and misfortunes, and often, doubtless, looking up to it with profoundest admiration; and then he glides off into a pleasant soliloquy as follows:

"Now, if this chimney of mine were for size a sort of belfry, for ding-donging at me about it--my wife and daughters were a sort of bells, always chiming together, or taking up each other's melodies at every pause, my wife the key-clapper of all, a very sweet ringing and pealing and chimney, I confess, but then the most silvery of bells may, sometimes, dismally toll, as well as merrily play," &c. 

But such extracts will give but an imperfect idea of the good old gentleman's soliloquies over the chimney and its secret closets and odd corners. In reading it, one almost insensibly imagines himself in some of those spacious old half-acre houses, that stand far out in the country, with a perfect camp-meeting of a fire-place, with huge "hickory" or oaken logs, piled on with no sparing hand. And then there is the high old mantle-piece with its quaint old ornaments and elaborate carving, and grotesque figures, with all the primitive simplicity of our saintly progenitors. 

Related post

Friday, May 29, 2026

Bookmarked for lyrical dialogue between personified trees and river waters: CLAREL Part 2 Canto 27

 

Friday, May 22, 2026

THE POWER OF THE RESURRECTION: 1863 memorial sermon with reminiscences of Clement C. Moore

Herein I am pleased to give the complete text of the sermon preached in Newport, Rhode Island by Oliver Sherman Prescott (1824-1903) the Sunday after the funeral of Clement C. Moore, as printed in 1863 with accompanying tributes in letters from Episcopal bishops Horatio Potter of New York and William Rollinson Whittingham of Maryland. As reported in the Church Journal, "the venerable and beloved Dr. Moore" had died "after a brief illness" on Friday, July 10, 1863 at his summer residence in Newport. His funeral took place on Monday the 13th in Trinity Church, Newport, where on Sunday, July 19, 1863 Rev. Prescott delivered the memorial sermon titled, The Power of the Resurrection.

Although quoted by Moore's biographer Samuel W. Patterson in The Poet of Christmas Eve: A Life of Clement Clarke Moore, 1779-1863 (Morehouse-Gorham Co., 1956) at pages 98 and 159; and alluded to passingly in Patterson's later article 

“The Centenary of Clement Clarke Moore—Poet of Christmas Eve.” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church, vol. 32, no. 3, 1963, pages 211–220 at 213. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42972989

the rarity of this hard-to-find item has unfortunately limited its potential reach and appreciation. WorldCat locates copies in only two libraries, the Boston Public Library and Keller Library of the General Theological Seminary in New York City. 

Both copies have been consulted while making the transcription offered below. With generous professional assistance from Melissa Chim, Scholarly Communications Librarian with Excelsior University and former Reference Librarian and Archivist at General Theological Seminary (GTS), I was able to examine scans of the printed version kindly provided by the Boston Public Library. Evidently the printed edition of Rev. Prescott's 1863 sermon on the Power of the Resurrection was not among the rare works transferred from GTS to Virginia Theological Seminary (VTS) in 2024, "selected due to their enduring scholarly and teaching value to the seminaries and The Episcopal Church, as well as their market value" according to a press release in February 2025 concerning the Future of the Keller Library Collection. As revealed in the same announcement,

"The remaining rare books that were not transferred to VTS have been purchased by James Cummins Bookseller."

Earlier this month I acquired from James Cummins Bookseller the printed sermon long restricted to the Rare Book Room of the General Theological Seminary Library. 

Presumably this was the copy that GTS librarian Niels Henry Sonne consulted and duly cited on page 379 of his enlightening essay

"‘The Night Before Christmas’: Who Wrote It?” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church, vol. 41, no. 4, 1972, pp. 373–80. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42973358. 

*** 

The Power of the Resurrection.

A 

SERMON

PREACHED IN

TRINITY CHURCH, NEWPORT, R. I.

ON THE

SEVENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY, 1863,

BEING THE SUNDAY FOLLOWING THE FUNERAL OF 

CLEMENT CLARK MOORE, L.L.D.

by

REV. O. S. PRESCOTT 


CHARLES E. HAMMETT, JR, NEWPORT, R. I.

1863.

***

LETTERS.


NEW YORK, 33 WEST 24TH STREET,
June 20, 1863.
MY DEAR DR. MOORE:

     I have often reproached myself that I have seen so little of you since I have been in the Episcopate, and that I have never given any adequate expression to my feelings of gratitude toward you for your kind services to me when I was your pupil in the General Theological Seminary, and for all your services to the Church through that Institution. During my recent absence from the city, on a visitation, I resolved that, when I returned to town, I would no longer delay to testify, however imperfectly, my gratitude, esteem, and veneration. But Dr. Beach, whom I met in a train, informed me that you were already gone to your summer retreat at Newport. Pardon me, then, dear sir, for intruding upon your repose and quiet. It will be little to you, but it is a great solace and relief to me to express — what it is always hard for me to express — what a grateful and tender recollection I have always retained of your kindness, of your gentle, yet admirable instruction, and of your lovely Christian character.

     God bless you, dear Dr. Moore, and give you fulness of peace and comfort, and enable you to enjoy many, many days yet on earth his ever present love and goodness. Asking your prayers and blessing, but not meaning to trouble you for a reply, I remain,

Most affectionately yours,
HORATIO POTTER.

DR. CLEMENT C. MOORE.

      P. S.— My departed son often spoke of the kindness he received from your son and daughter, in Paris. 

***

NEW YORK, 33 WEST 24TH STREET,
July 3, 1863.

MY DEAR DR. MOORE:

     It becomes my duty to intrude once more upon your  quiet retreat. A few days after my former note, that is, on the forenoon of the 24th of June (Wednesday), the Alumni of the General Seminary had an early service and communion at St. Paul's Chapel, and afterwards a social breakfast at the Astor House. The meeting was distinguished for warmth and cordiality, and by many affectionate references to the friends and benefactors of the Seminary. The Rev. Dr. Coxe was charged to communicate to the Bishop of Maryland and to Hugh Davy Evans, a testimony of their sympathy and grateful regard; while, by a unanimous and earnest resolution, I was requested to convey to you an expression of their gratitude for your many and important services to the Seminary, of their veneration for your character, and of their affectionate interest in your health and happiness. I need hardly say how happy I am to be the honored representative of the Alumni for communicating sentiments in which I most heartily concur.

     On our return to town in the autumn, I promise myself the pleasure of paying my respects to you.

Ever most faithfully yours,
HORATIO POTTER.

TO CLEMENT C. MOORE, LL. D. 

*** 

BALTIMORE, July 15, 1863.

DEAR PRESCOTT: 

     Thirty years, almost, have dimmed my personal recollections of my dear old friend, Dr. C. C. Moore. Since 1840, I have not chanced to meet with him five times, nor then to converse with him for more than five minutes at a time. 

     As a pupil, resident graduate, and librarian of the Seminary, I was sharer with all his other pupils of the free, gracious urbanity and generosity which distinguished his intercourse with them. His pure, simple, gentle modesty, and unaffected diffidence in displaying the ample store of learning which he was nevertheless well able to bring forth on fit occasions, secured for him the profoundest respect of those even who were disposed to complain of the absence of a dogmatical authority to which they would have felt it an advantage to themselves to have been brought more under subjection. Those who obtained closer access to him (and none were debarred by inaccessibility on his part), soon learned to love him as a father or elder brother, and found rich enjoyment in drawing out the treasures of his various reading, seasoned continually with the gentle flow of his quiet, sparkling humor. 

     Afterward, he became associated with me, during my rectorship of St. Luke's Church, as one of the Vestry of the Parish. In that body he took full part in all its deliberations and doings, bringing his clear perceptions of Christian duty and high sense of gentlemanly honor to bear upon every transaction in which he had voice or part. In every possible way, he and his family contributed to the common service and work of the congregation. Quiet and retiring as he was, his promptness and punctuality in every duty, and spontaneous readiness in every charity, made him unconsciously preëminent in the loving band of Christian brothers then bound together by the ties of parochial association in "St. Luke's, Greenwich." His personal attention and liberal communication of his means were never wanting to any reasonable undertaking for the advancement of true religion, or the alleviation of human misery.

     Again for several years it was my privilege to sit with him in the Faculty of the Seminary, once more associated in the pursuits to which his kind labors and attentions had so largely contributed to introduce me. The same translucent simplicity of character and childlikeness of inoffensive and unsuspecting goodness still manifested themselves in the Professor at the Board, and in all the mutual relations of our happy little community, as strongly as they had in earlier years to the youthful student. I still revered and loved him with affections intensified, not changed, by the lapse of time and alteration of relations.

     If you have time to consult Drs. Seabury and Haight, and Floyd Smith, Esq., of New York, I think you will be likely to obtain from them reminiscences of Dr. Moore more fresh and particular than my hurried recollections have been able to afford. They have been associated with him in much the same relations as I, but I think more intimately in some respects, and certainly more recently.

     The Church can ill afford to part with such a son, even at the ripe age at which he has been called home. He was "an Israelite indeed, in whom there was no guile," and our unhappy times furnish too few examples of that rare character to be able to lose them without a poignant sense of deprivation.

     It has not tended to lessen my sense of personal loss by the death of Dr. Moore, that only the day before the announcement of his decease appeared, I had seen that of the death of another of my dear old associates in church work of forty years' standing — Mr. C. N. S. Rowland, many years Treasurer of the Diocese of New York, and, like Dr. Moore, one of my Vestry at St. Luke's Church, New York, 1831-5.

I am,

Faithfully and affectionately yours,

W. R. WHITTINGHAM.

REV. O. S. PRESCOTT.

***

SERMON.

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

I am the Resurrection and the Life, saith the Lord; he that believeth in Me, though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in Me shall never die.—John xi. 25, 26. 

The titles of our Blessed Lord are not barren honours, but names of real Powers. They witness of Him as He is, and declare what He is. They are full of hidden meaning and mysterious grace, for they are outward and visible shadows of an inward and divine substance; and this because the Lord is our God; because the Son of man is the Son of the Everlasting Father, and so the Son of the Father, that He is One with Him in all that He is, and whatever is true  of the Father as relates to the Godhead, is true also of Him, and as the Father is in His Divine Essence all that He claims to be and all that His attributes attest that He is, being not only wise, and just, and loving, and orderly, but Wisdom itself, and Justice itself, and Love itself, and Order itself; so is the Son all that He calls Himself, and all that He is called by those "who worship him in sincerity and truth." This is what is meant when it is said that His titles are names of Powers, are outward shadows of a divine substance; and both of these, the shadow and the substance, being claimed, possessed, used by Christ, are, in Him, made full of meaning and full of grace to all who put their whole trust in Him. These titles may be every-day words with us, as are those of our text; we may speak them thoughtlessly or lightly, may confine them within narrow and straitened limits, but this will affect not Him Whose they are, but ourselves alone, for no disrespect or damage, wilful or unwitting, done toward Christ can ever reach Him; like the prayer of the self-righteous pharisee, it remains with ones self, it ends where it begins, bringing loss and punishment upon the perpetrator, and upon him alone. 

Christ says, "I am the Resurrection and the Life." There is no need to do more than indicate very briefly the circumstances under which these words were spoken. There lived at Bethany, a village near Jerusalem, a family, consisting of a brother and two sisters, with which, in His journeyings to and fro, the Son of Joseph and of Mary was accustomed to stay. The brother fell sick and died and was buried. Word had been sent to his friend Jesus, but He had, to  all appearance, disregarded or forgotten it, for we read that He remained "two days in the place where He was." Lazarus had lain four days in the tomb, and his bereaved sisters wept at home, when news arrived that the Master was approaching. He entered not into the village, but first went to the place where Lazarus was laid, and there the sisters with their sympathizing friends gathered around Him. On the way the words were spoken, "I am the Resurrection and the Life; he that believeth in Me, though he were dead yet shall live; and whosoever liveth and believeth  in Me shall never die." That there was in this utterance no idle arrogation of power, the verses following prove. The Divine Speaker added, "Lazarus come forth!" and immediately the dead one, closely wrapped in burial clothes, bound hand and foot, so that had he been living he could not have moved, heard the living words and arose, and at Christ's further bidding they loosed him from his bonds and he took his place again among the dwellers upon earth. These words and this event were the first corner-stone in the foundation of the great system of Christianity as it is in philosophy. From so slight an event, in men's eyes, as the visit of a friend to a friend's grave, grew the enunciation of the grandest dogma of the Christian faith. It was preached by word and deed, and by these two witnesses was established; and ever since, when Christ's ministers and messengers have laid to rest and commended unto God those who have been sealed with Christ's seal in their foreheads, the same glorious and comfortable words have been spoken, and testimony has been borne to the power of Christ's titles, and He has been proclaimed, as He proclaimed Himself, forever and forevermore, the Resurrection and the Life. 

I. Mark now the expression, the Resurrection and the Life. He does not limit or confine His claim to the simple ability to raise the dead, or to give life to whom He will; but He declares that He Himself— He, the Man there standing and weeping over a friend's grave; He, the son of a carpenter of Galilee and the poor woman that carpenter had espoused; He, who was often the guest  of Lazarus, and Martha, and Mary,—is Himself, in deed and in truth, the very Resurrection and the very Life; that is, He is the cause, source, origin of these, and that without Him they would not, because they could not be. Place yourselves in imagination among that sorrowing and awed company; think of these words, not made familiar by use, not assented to from habit or education, but as uttered for the first time and for the first time heard, and they will take on their full and startling strangeness. It is no wonder that men received them not, but crucified the Speaker of them. They would do so now under similar circumstances. This He knew, and knew that by their proclamation He was helping to affix the seal to His own death-warrant, for it was His teaching in regard to the Resurrection which brought upon him the charge of blasphemy, for which He was condemned to be crucified. This may help you to account for the solemn character of the gospel history of Lazarus' recall to life and for the Blessed Master's weeping. He foresaw the revolution He was working, the bitter opposition His truth would excite, and the suffering through which man was to pass to the joy that was to be born out of suffering, and to the triumph of Life over death and of the Resurrection over the grave. He was man, it is true, very man, but who can doubt, listening to this record, that He was God also? He saw the end from the beginning, and He was doing all things well. He was the Resurrection and the Life. He had come, the Light of the World, to bring life and immortality to light through His Gospel. From the exile of Adam from Eden mankind had dwelt in darkness and the shadow of death, and now the time was come when, in the Providence of God, the clouds were to be scattered, and the sea smoothed, and the sun to shine. He had come, Who had worked hitherto and Who worketh still, Who was all-manifold in operation and all-fertile in resource. As had been foretold of Him from afar, "He did not strive nor cry, neither was His Voice heard in the streets," but the revolution was accomplished; slowly and gradually, day after day and week after week bringing their silent additions and contributions, without shocks and without violence upon his part the work progressed, till, finally, He died upon the Cross seemingly giving the lie to His own words, but in reality establishing them, for the third day He came forth from the grave at midnight and in silence, raising Himself from the dead, strong and glorious, as one refreshed with sleep, and appearing to His followers a vision of beauty, too intense for apprehension or belief. Then there came suddenly upon the earth a great calm. The Lion of the tribe of Judah had prevailed, death and hell were conquered and taken captive, the Holy Ghost was poured out, the Church of Christ was quickened into being, and the faith of Jesus was proclaimed to man. Out from Jerusalem began the preaching of the Gospel of the Resurrection; its blessed influence was shed abroad, and the idols and mummeries and sacrifices of paganism passed away and became as though they had never been, before the establishment of the heavenly worship and the Pure Oblation of the religion of the Cross. Looking back upon the past, we behold Christianity,— the fellowship of Christ with the Resurrection, for such the living Church of God is — rising and increasing like the sun in its splendour. It was majestic, it was beautiful, it was soothing to man's grief, it was grateful to his needs, it was satisfying to his hopes, it was welcome, it was thrilling because it was the Body of Christ and the Power of the Father. It rescued man; it uplifted him; it saved him from the devil's service and the devil's doom, and it set him up to dwell with angels. 

II. These titles are not synonymous. Christ is the Resurrection and the Life — the Resurrection of the dead, and the Life of all that live. He is, as His great Apostle says, the Head of the Church and the Saviour of the body, the living Head of all souls in every place in earth, in paradise, or Heaven; and the Saviour of all bodies built up into and forming his own mystical Body, wherever they may be, beneath the sod or beneath the waters, and which at the Resurrection shall hear His Voice and awake. He came into the world in the substance of our flesh to make all things new, to abolish and put away death by His Life and the grave by His Resurrection. Hiding His Divinity in His Passion, He carried captive His captivity, and, as the sun from the clouds, He passed out strangely from the closed sepulchre, leaving its stone unmoved, and its seal unbroken, and its guards undisturbed, and shed abroad the light of a new and supernatural life. Before He came, the world was full of "darkness and cruel habitations." Inspired men among the Jews may have caught far-off glimpses and faint shadowings of the glories of the Resurrection, as when Elijah, passed to life without seeing death, or when they read of the Redeemer who should stand at the latter day upon the earth; but with these exceptions the veil of uncertainty and doubt was before all faces. An idea of immortality for the soul was the highest and best the most virtuous attained unto, and this seems to have been born out of intense love of life, but for the masses there was no hope; they saw that the wise and prudent passed away and ceased to be as well as the ignorant and foolish, and so they cast off all restraint and abandoned themselves as brute beasts, and followed their own lusts, and maddened themselves with strange desires, making gods of their own pleasures and falling down and worshipping them. All this Christ came to change thoroughly and absolutely. His work was different but not less complete than when in the beginning light was separated from darkness and the first day was ushered into being. He died upon the Cross for the redemption of all mankind, and He rose from the dead for the justification of them that believe in Him; for we are what we are, in privilege and in promise, because He is what He is, and He is now our Resurrection and our Life. This is the great verity of Christianity; the light of God and the Lamb in the midst of the temple, the central point around which all else revolves, and to publish which all else was done. His preaching of this brought Him to the Cross. His followers, iterating it, turned the world upside down. For this He witnessed a good confession before Pontius Pilate, and St. Paul was called in question before kings and courts. To this the glorious company of the Apostles were witnesses, and out of it grew the noble army of Martyrs. 

The Resurrection and the Life came into our dead and darkened world and did His work, His strange work, and death became a sleep, and the grave a place of rest. Before Him faded away old philosophies and cruel superstitions, and savage sacrifices, and strange witchcrafts, and gods of wood and stone, and ignorance of one's origin and doubt of one's destiny; and around Him,— for He is the Centre of all real religion,— there grew up the holy Church with its supernatural life and supernatural ways, made by Him His kingdom, and intended by Him to be forever like Himself, One, Mighty, Holy and Eternal. At His Birth the Angels sang glory to God on high and on earth peace, good will to men, and ever since, day after day, and in the silent night, in populous cities and over quiet plains, on bleak sides of mountains and under leafy meadow shades, as constantly as sun and moon and stars go forth in heaven, so steadily the stately march of Christian services and Christian truth has held its way, and Heaven has been let down to earth most wondrously, and the evil spirits of paganism have been chased back to the darkness whence they came.

III. There is another consideration connected with the titles of our Divine Lord. They are not sterile honours, but fruitful Powers,— not dead words, but living and lively things. They bring to others and bring others unto that of which they witness and are the pledge. Because He is the Resurrection and the Life, therefore he that believeth in Him, though he were dead yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in Him shall never die. He would not only that we should be with Him but that we should be like Him, and therefore He giveth Himself to us with all that He is and all that He hath. For this reason St. Paul, who knew the power of His Resurrection, writes: "If ye then be risen with Christ seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth on the Right Hand of God." Through His Risen and Glorified Humanity come to us all gifts of salvation and forgiveness and overcoming of sin and restoration unto holiness and victory over the grave and vanquishment of death and oneness with God. In It are bound up all treasures of wisdom and mercy, and pardon, and charity, and saintliness. All that He is in Himself, that He  becomes in us by dwelling in us. On the Cross He died for us, and by the Resurrection He lives in us. He is the new and second Adam, and was made, not a "living soul" only, but a "Quickening Spirit," that through His Sinless Flesh life might pass to all who should be made the members of His body. Before he came, the multitude of men knew nothing of their origin or their destiny; to them death was a fearful leap out into darkness, and the grave was a blank horror. But when His work was ended, when He had passed up from the Hill of His Sublime Ascension, and the clouds had received Him out of sight, the stone which, since the death of Abel, had closed futurity from man's gaze, was rolled away and the fair angel of Hope sat upon it, and around was shed light and peace; for though we know not fully what we shall be, we know that he is the Resurrection and the Life, and that we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. 

We are led to-day to speak of death, and we begin by speaking of life, for the death of the Christian is an entrance upon life eternal. 

When we were last gathered together in this church, it was to celebrate the funeral of the venerable and venerated Dr. Clement Clark Moore. Full of years and full of honors, his pathway to the grave sloped by growing infirmities, and his shortening steps taken more and more tremblingly and slow as he lost his hold on life, and clung unto the earth whither he was returning, he has passed from our sight as a shock of corn fully ripe. You who have known him only in the frailness and feebleness of the extremest years of man's life, cannot well understand the important place he has filled and the important work he has done in and for the Church of which, in God's mercy, it is our privilege to be members. He has not left behind him, it may be safely said, among the faithful laity one whose departure will be so widely felt, and whose memory will be so fondly treasured. To his munificence the Church is indebted for her chief Theological School — the General Seminary in New York. Its entire landed estate in that city was his gift. For a long series of years he filled, and filled well, the chair of Hebrew and Oriental Literature, rendering his services modestly and unpretendingly, and for the most part gratuitously. He survived all those associated with him when he first entered upon his duties in connection with it. The hundreds who have been educated in that noblest Church Institution of this land, have reaped the benefit of his good deeds, and been recipients of his beneficence, and they bless his memory. 

This is hardly the place to do more than allude to his career as a man of polite letters. It is enough that his position is no mean one. He was a large-minded scholar and an open-handed Christian gentleman, and those qualities were wedded in him to a genuine simplicity and childlike modesty, as winning as they are rare. His whole character was formed and fashioned by religion; it was a Christian product, not to be found outside the limits of Christian influence, but rooted in the soil of the church, and bearing supernatural flowers and fruits blossoming and ripening in the light of the Resurrection and the Life. He gave much to the cause of Christ, in love, and labor, and money, and the Church — which is the embodiment of that cause — gave back to him a Christian training, a Christlike nearness, the high consolation of her heavenly gifts and the sure and certain hope of the Resurrection and the Life. He could say upon his knees, as a child, "But though, O Lord, have mercy upon us miserable offenders;" and he could strive like an hero to fulfil her law of loving his neighbour as himself. Modest, unpretending, retiring, always a learner, and ever looking out to be taught, he seems to have striven to live only, as has been said of one who laboured in another sphere, "to love and to be unknown." He did hard work for the education of the clergy in his generation and provided for its continuance forever, thereby opening a perennial spring of good to men. He prosecuted many labors and effected many religious undertakings, and all the while he was content to be overlooked by the world, and not to be known outside of his place. He did his work for God alone, with a single eye and a pure heart, undisturbed by inimical surroundings and undistracted by applause, making Christ his sole hope, and Heaven his sole aim, and seeking to lay up abiding treasure and eternal recompense in "the Land that is far off," but to be reached by all. 

While the General Theological Seminary shall remain, and while the blessed Christmas-tide shall be celebrated with Christmas rejoicings, — and this will doubtless be till Christ shall come again,— so long shall the name of the genial poet, and learned professor, and munificent benefactor live in the hearts of the Reverend Fathers and the innocent, loving children of our Holy Church. 

Such as he was he has passed away, and there is no one, to all appearance, with the heart or will to occupy his place. His departure severs another tie linking us with the past, and removes another of the masters to whom my brothers of the clergy have been accustomed to look up. We shall no more break for him or eat with him the Bread of Life. He has come for the last time to his place before the altar, and for the first time he felt no will to kneel at it. His body was met at the entrance of this churchyard with the words, "I am the Resurrection and the Life." They fell on ears closed to the sounds of earth. But while we commended his body to the ground, and baptized it with the baptism of the dust, in the hope of a glorious Resurrection, we doubted not that his soul was far away from the vexations and cares of this wicked and troubled world, with those he had loved, in joy, and felicity, and rest, in the Paradise of God. 

And now what remains for us but to thank God for the good example given us in our deceased brother, and to endeavor ourselves to imitate it. I have sketched it poorly and imperfectly, but lovingly and reverently, as one whose privilege it has been to sit at his feet and learn of him; and I have sought to bear in mind and not offend his keen and simple modesty and unaffected childlikeness. He was a rare man and a Christian gentleman. He has finished his labours, he has entered into rest, and he is blessed, for his works do follow him even while they remain with us as a praise throughout the churches.

And now let us lift up our hearts, and lift up our voices, and pray for ourselves and for all souls, that we fail not to attain unto the rest that remaineth for the people of God. Around us, while we are alive and remain in the flesh, are at best but fleeting and transient things. Old friends and faces, old homes and haunts, bright days and sunny hours pass by us and are gone; but before us is the kingdom of God and the Resurrection, and It is all enduring, all satisfying, all divine. There are no storms in Its firmament, and no clouds move across Its sky, there is no change, no vicissitude, no fading, or withering, or passing away. As we enter upon It, such we shall remain forever in It, growing nearer unto and more like Him Who is Chiefest among ten thousand and Altogether Lovely, yet never attaining unto Him because He is the very Resurrection and the Life. 

Related posts