Showing posts with label Hennig Cohen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hennig Cohen. Show all posts

Friday, October 9, 2026

Reviving Melville before the "Melville Revival"

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK


Rediscovering De Berard’s condensed “Epic of the Whale,” Critical Synopsis, and Melville bio in Volume 2 of the “Classic Library” (1902) and “Classic Tales” (1905) anthologies 

Portrait of Frederick B. De Berard.
Source: Classic Tales by Famous Authors Vol. 1
(New York: The Bodleian Society, 1905)

👉 First published on Substack, reposted here since I am keen to put into the mix of accessible, searchable data the actual words used by anthologist and unabashed bibliophile Frederick Brigham De Berard in praise of Melville and Moby-Dick. Not that De Berard was alone in recording his high estimation of Melville's writings, only two years into the new 20th century. Edwin Monroe Bacon devoted five pages to Melville as one of the "Famous Makers of American Literature" profiled in Literary Pilgrimages in New England (Silver, Burdett & Company, 1902) on pages 451-456. Bacon creatively fashioned the section on Melville in Berkshire County, Mass. as a dialogue with local Pittsfield expert "Mrs. H. M. Plunkett" = Harriette Merrick Hodge Plunkett, the well-known health advocate and journalist.

" 'Moby Dick' has been called the most dramatic and imaginative of his works. In his later writings he was much given to speculative philosophy, and his popularity waned.... Notwithstanding his remarkable adventures and sea-faring life, there was nothing of the jovial, breezy air of the sailor about him. He had more the gentle carriage of the student, the manner of the man of books. He was more than Dana a pioneer of our sea-story writers, and in his best works set a pace not easy for his successors to follow. His picturesque style came through his excellent training in English composition, to which he showed an aptitude in his youth, and from his early reading of the masters of English literature."

-- Literary Pilgrimages, page 456 https://archive.org/details/literarypilgrima00bacorich/page/456/mode/2up

By 1905 numerous surveys of American Literature counted Moby Dick as an important work, in some way worthy of attention in this fresh field of study. Granted, some early efforts happily classified Melville with "lesser writers" or "minor writers." Necessarily, the elevation of Melville's status to Giant of American Letters would take time, and the concentrated efforts of exceptionally competent academics--at Columbia University during the 1920's "Melville Revival," and later at Yale, under the tutelage of Stanley T. Williams. Nevertheless, Moby-Dick got respectful attention in numerous textbooks published between 1891 and 1905, including the following titles:

  • Julian Hawthorne and Leonard Lemmon, American Literature: an Elementary Textbook for Use in High Schools and Academies (Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1891). At page 211 rates Moby-Dick "the most powerful of Melville's books." 
  • Alphonso G. Newcomer, American Literature (Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1901) page 128. Ranks Herman Melville as "the most important" of New York "writers of tales of adventure whose scenes were laid on shipboard or in remote quarters of the earth...." Melville "in his youth embarked upon a whaling vessel bound for the Pacific and spent several years, a portion of the time in captivity, among the South Sea Islands. The series of partly fanciful tales founded upon his experiences — Typee (1846 ), Оmоо (1847), Moby Dick, or the White Whale (1851), etc., — had a wide circulation, and an occasional admirer can still be found who will pronounce them superior to Cooper's."
  • Charles Noble, Studies in American Literature (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1898) at pages 287-288. Cites Melville as "our best novelist of travel and sea-life"; Moby-Dick (1851) listed with Mardi (1849), Battle-Pieces and Aspects of the War (1866), and Clarel (1876) as notable literary productions after Typee and Omoo. 
  • Henry S. Pancoast, An Introduction to American Literature (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1898). While this volume contains no substantive discussion of Melville or his writings, Typee and Moby-Dick are duly listed in the Appendix, Table III charting the "Literature of the Republic" c. 1809-1897.

    The perceived slight motivated Albert H. Smyth to point out, as a mistake, "the omission of Herman Melville, in his best books—'Moby Dick', 'Typee', 'Omoo'—one of the best of American writers" in an otherwise favorable review of Pancoast's Introduction, published in the April 1898 issue of The Citizen. 
  • William P. Trent, A History of American Literature, 1607-1865 (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1905). Placing Melville with "The Romancers" on pages 389-391, Trent recognizes Moby-Dick as a "masterpiece," flawed however by "inordinate length" and the bad influence of Carlye (a fault lamented by Melville's earliest critics, some more than fifty years before).

    "Melville's greatest achievement still awaited him, however, for after two other fair books of adventure he published, in 1851, his masterpiece, Moby Dick, or the White Whale. If it were not for its inordinate length, its frequently inartistic heaping up of details, and its obvious imitation of Carlylean tricks of style and construction, this narrative of tremendous power and wide knowledge might be perhaps pronounced the greatest sea story in literature. The breath of the sea is in it and much of the passion and charm of the most venturous of all the venturous callings plied upon the deep. It is a cool reader that does not become almost as eager as the terrible Captain Ahab in his demoniacal pursuit of Moby Dick, the invincible whale, a creation of the imagination not unworthy of a great poet. In this uneven , but on the whole genuine, work of genius, Melville probably overtasked himself...."
  • Mildred Cabell Watkins, American Literature (American Book Company, 1894) page 47. Commends Moby-Dick to young readers as one of Melville's "wildly exciting tales of adventure."
***
Packed with variously diverting tales of the sea, Volume 2 in the 20-volume Classic Library of Famous Literature (New York: The Bodleian Society, 1902) gives Moby-Dick its due, and then some. This particular volume offers a bold abridgement of Herman Melville’s 1851 masterpiece by series editor-arranger Frederick B. De Berard (1853-1927). The editorially condensed version unfolds in twenty-three sections that draw generously from narrative and Ahab-centered chapters of Moby-Dick, casting them collectively as “The Epic of the Whale.” [Fn 1; see below]

Six entertaining pieces by other writers follow the reader-friendly digest of Melville’s whaling “Epic.” Hennig Cohen, the outstanding old-school Melville scholar who (way back in the 1970’s) first discovered De Berard’s high regard for Melville and Moby-Dick, thus described the contents of Volume 2 in a little noticed bibliographical note:

Melville is clearly preëminent among a good and varied company. The other selections, in the order in which they appear, are a melodramatic excerpt on Malay pirates from Hard Cash by Charles Reade and Victor Hugo’s bravura description of the cannon that breaks loose on shipboard from Ninety-Three; two personal narratives, Richard Henry Dana on rounding Cape Horn, and an account of “A Real Shipwreck” in the South Seas in the 1870s by the Earl of Pembroke; and finally, two comic selections, William S. Sullivan’s [Gilbert’s] Bab ballad “The Yarn of the Nancy Bell” and Samuel Lover’s Sketch “Barny O’Reirdon, the Navigator.” [Fn 2]

All seven of the nautical stories in Volume 2, including the condensed “Epic of the Whale,” had previously been collected by De Berard in Famous Tales of the Sea (New York: International Book and Publishing Co., 1899; copyrighted by Isaac H. Blanchard Co.). 

Below are links to digitized texts of the “The Epic of the Whale” in three differently titled anthologies, each edited by Frederick Brigham De Berard and accessible via either Hathi Trust Digital Library 

or the Internet Archive:

As Cohen also found before me, the 1899 set of Famous Tales lacked the impressive editorial apparatus provided in the 1902 Classic Library and 1905 Classic Tales volumes produced in New York by the Bodleian Society (not affiliated with the renowned library in Oxford, England).

The 1902 and 1905 sets contain the same “General Preface” by Frederick B. De Berard and “General Introduction” by Rossiter Johnson, presented sequentially in the front of Volume 1 (featuring stories of “Battle, Camp and Siege”) together with dignified photographic portraits of De Berard and Johnson. Although Rossiter Johnson had personally known and corresponded with Herman Melville, the “General Introduction” that Johnson provided does not specifically mention or identify the author of Moby-Dick alongside other, named American writers including Irving, Poe, Hawthorne, Edward Everett Hale, and Bret Harte. [Fn 3]

De Berard likewise left Melville out of the “General Preface,” although it opens quoting Sir Thomas Browne (one of Melville’s favorite authors) on mutability (one of Melville’s favorite themes). As a good bibliophile should, De Berard fairly revels in the enjoyment of timeless “literature of imagination and fancy—the powerful imaginings of the great romancers and novelists, the beautiful fancies of great poets.” De Berard’s enthusiasm for books and authors, and for a shared culture of reading based on great works of literature, seems boundless. [Fn 4] His remarkably ardent “General Preface” begs for a closer look which I hope to give in a future post.

Here I want to focus on Volume 2 of the Classic Library and Classic Tales anthologies, where De Berard more than made up for the seeming neglect of Melville in Volume 1 by supplying a “Critical Synopsis” of the abridged Moby-Dick and short bio of its author. [Fn 5] Absent from most accounts of the legendary “Melville Revival,” the editorial contributions of Frederick Brigham De Berard deserve a wider circulation and appreciation. To that end, complete texts of the relevant “Critical Synopsis” and “Biographical” entry are given below, transcribed from digital images of Volume 2 in Classic Tales by Famous Authors (1905). Texts in Classic Tales are identical with those in the earlier Classic Library of Famous Literature (1902). For example, the typographical error of “Tmbiguities” for “Ambiguities” appears in both editions.

Enjoy!

CRITICAL SYNOPSIS OF SELECTIONS [ pages iii-iv ]

EPIC OF THE WHALE, THE : BY HERMAN MELVILLE

This is an abstract, or condensation, of the famous book, “Moby Dick; or, the White Whale,” which appeared in the ‘forties. It is one of the most powerful works ever written to depict the reality of a sailor’s life aboard a whaling ship. It is based upon the actual experience of the author, who, curiously enough, combined a taste for roving life of adventure with profound philosophic insight and remarkable literary power. The work is scarcely a story in the ordinary sense, having but a slight thread of plot.

In an encounter with an infuriated sperm whale, the captain of a New England whaling-ship had his leg bitten off and narrowly escaped with his life. Morbid regret was followed by melancholia and finally by monomania. Yearning for vengeance, he devoted his life to a search for the White Whale, “Moby Dick,” by which he had been maimed. For years he sailed in pursuit of his enemy, remaining at sea until his ship became crazy and weather-worn, and his crew were inspired with superstitious dread of the half-mythical monster, of whose very existence they were in doubt. The finding of the great whale, the attack upon it, and the destruction wrought upon boats, ship and crew, are related in the story. This slight and fanciful romance is the foundation for a series of intensely graphic descriptions of whaling life, of the sea and the creatures that dwell therein. The episodes descriptive of the whale and his life are classics of natural history. The accounts of the chase and capture of the mighty cetacean are unrivaled for their dramatic force and powerful diction. The present arrangement includes the narrative portions and those episodes relating directly to whale-life and whaling. 

  

BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF AUTHORS [ x - xi ]

... MELVILLE, HERMAN: Born at New York, August 1, 1819; died in that city, September 28, 1891. This author, comparatively neglected during more than a generation, ranks among the most powerful and original American men-of-letters. He led a roving and adventurous life. As a boy, he “ran away,” to sea, shipping at New Bedford for a whaling voyage, which extended over several years. While ashore on the Marquesas Islands, he and his companion were abandoned by their ship, and were made captive by the natives — a wholly savage race of cannibals. The story of his life as a sailor, his captivity and escape, and his experience as a “beach-comber” in Tahiti, are told in “Typee” (1846), “Omoo” (1847), and “White Jacket, the World in a Man-of-War” (1850). These works are vivid pictures of sea life and adventure; but Melville’s chief title to fame is due to “Moby Dick; or, the White Whale” — a work of great literary distinction, one of the most forceful series of descriptive pictures in the language, and an account of sea life and the mysteries of the deep which stands wholly alone for vividness and actuality. Melville’s other writings are: “Mardi, Etc.’‘ (1849), “Redburn” (1849), “Pierre; or, the Tmbiguities” (1852), several volumes of poems and short stories. He gave public lectures in the years 1857 to 1860; and from 1866 to 1885 was an official in the New York Customs Office. He became morbid in his later years, rigidly secluded himself from the public and all but a few friends, and died a recluse.

CLASSIC TALES BY FAMOUS AUTHORS, ed. Frederick B. De Berard.
Twenty volumes, offered by Kubik Fine Books Ltd. of Dayton, Ohio.

Footnotes

  1. Editor Frederick B. De Berard compiled “The Epic of the Whale” from the following chapters in Moby-Dick; or, The Whale (1851), evidently using some version of the oft reprinted 1892 edition titled Moby Dick or the White Whale and copyrighted by Herman’s widow Elizabeth Shaw Melville: 

    1. The Monomaniac Captain [Chapter 36, The Quarter-Deck]
    2. Moby Dick [41]
    3. The Chase [Chapter 47, The Mat-Maker; and Chapter 48, The First 4. Lowering]
    4. The Line [60]
    5. Stubb Kills a Whale [61]
    6. The Dart [62]
    7. The Crotch [63]
    8. The Sharks [64, Stubb’s Supper]
    9. Cutting In [67]
    10. The Monkey-Rope [72]
    11. The Sperm Whale’s Head [74]
    12. The Battering-Ram [76]
    13. The Great Heidelburgh Tun [77]
    14. The Pequod Meets the Virgin [81]
    15. Pitchpoling [84]
    16. The Tail [86]
    17. The Grand Armada [87]
    18. The Try Works [96]
    19. Stowing Down and Clearing Up [98]
    20. Measurement of the Whale’s Skeleton [103]
    21. The Chase—First Day [133]
    22. The Chase—Second Day [134]
    23. The Chase—Third Day [135] 
  2. Hennig Cohen, “The Famous Tales Anthologies: Recognition of Melville, 1899” in Brodie, Alexander H., et al. “Bibliographical Notes.” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, volume 68, number 2, 1974, pages 63–83. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24302066. Accessed 4 Oct. 2026. In the quoted passage, Cohen incorrectly attributes the “Yarn of Nancy Bell” to “William S. Sullivan,” apparently confusing William S. Gilbert with Gilbert’s composing partner Arthur Sullivan. De Berard’s Famous Tales of the Sea (1899); Classic Library (1902); and Classic Tales (1905) all credit the comic “Yarn” to Gilbert.

    Ignored in the Historical Note for the 1988 Northwestern-Newberry Edition of Moby-Dick, Hennig Cohen’s 1974 find is rarely mentioned in subsequent Melville scolarship. Michael Kearns broke the silence by citing Cohen’s discovery as more good evidence for the popular appeal of Moby-Dick before the academic “Melville Revival.” See Michael Kearns, Writing for the Street, Writing in the Garret: Melville, Dickinson, and Private Publication (The Ohio State University Press, 2010) page 127. Accessible via JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16qk3jw.9 and Project MUSE, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/30/oa_monograph/book/24310/pdf.

  3. For the content of known letters to Rossiter Johnson, see Herman Melville, Correspondence, edited by Lynn Horth (Northwestern University Press, 1993) pages 503-504. <https://books.google.com/books/about/Correspondence.html?id=nBeBBc3m4yYC>

  4. In the role of author F. B. De Berard contributed two pieces of his own to the Classic Library/Classic Tales anthology. Volume 3 includes De Berard’s How They Took the Kashmir Bastion with other “Tales of Heroism”; and Volume 17 places his account of Baldur the Beautiful with "Famous Tales of Gods and Heroes.” Brief as it is, De Berard’s modest author bio in Volume 3 may serve as a helpful starting point for further study: 

    "DE BERARD, FREDERICK B. : Born at Racine, Wis., 1853. A prolific writer during the past twenty-five years, but mainly upon technical subjects and topics of temporary interest. His strictly literary work has been confined to criticisms, reviews and a very few stories and poems. For a number of years he has been occupied with practical studies of economic questions, and particularly with investigations touching taxation and the municipal management of the city of New York."

    <https://archive.org/details/classictalesbyfa03debe/page/n33/mode/2up>

    Born October 4, 1853, Frederick B. De Berard was a son of Frances Julia Merrill and Fredrick William De Berard, a grocer in Racine, Wisconsin. Frederick B. married Anna Mary Collins (Annie) in Chicago on June 4, 1878 and the couple had two children. During the first three decades of the 20th century, De Berard worked for the Merchants’ Association of New York as a statistician and eventually chief researcher. He died of a sudden heart attack at the age of 73, as reported in the Brooklyn Eagle for August 12, 1927:

    "Frederick B. DeBerard of 544 E. 18th St., for 30 years connected with the Merchants Association of New York and regarded as one of the ablest investigators in this city, died Wednesday [August 10, 1927] at Lake Parlin, M[ain]e., where he had been spending the summer. Death was due to heart trouble.

    Mr. DeBerard, who was 73 years old, had been connected with the Merchants Association since it was founded and at the time of his death was director of research for the organization. He was in charge of all its important investigations. He was born in Racine, Wis., and is survived by his widow, Mrs. Annie M. DeBerard; a daughter, Miss Hazel DeBerard, and a son, Willard E. DeBerard. Services will be held in the Fairchild Chapel, 36 Lefferts pl., tomorrow afternoon at 1 o’clock. Interment will be in Kensico Cemetery."

  5. As previously noted by Cohen, two other volumes in the Classical Library and Classic Tales sets also contain writings by Melville: Volume 14 reprints Melville’s short fiction The Bell Tower as one of six “Famous Tales of Enchantment”; and Volume 16 collects “Famous Tales of Barbarians and Savages” including Captive among Cannibals, condensed from passages in the latter half of Melville’s first book, Typee, more specifically chapters 15-19, 30, 32, and 34. Four stories in Volume 16 headed “In the South Seas” are adapted from two collections by Louis Becke (not Typee as stated in Cohen’s 1974 “Note”). De Berard excerpted “Rangers of the Tia Kau” from Becke’s By Reef and Palm (London; T. Fisher Unwin, 1894); while “Ninia,” “At a Kava Drinking,” and “Feast at Pentecost” are from The Ebbing of the Tide: South Sea Stories by Louis Becke (J. B. Lippincott Company, 1896).

Related posts

  • Charles Goodrich Whiting, 1891 memorial article in the Springfield, Mass. Republican
    https://melvilliana.blogspot.com/2016/08/charles-goodrich-whiting-author-of.html

Monday, October 5, 2026

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK

Book-lover Frederick B. De Berard on the greatness of MOBY-DICK by Scott Norsworthy

Rediscovering De Berard’s condensed “Epic of the Whale,” Critical Synopsis, and Melville bio in Volume 2 of the “Classic Library” (1902) and “Classic Tales” (1905) anthologies

Read on Substack

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile by Herman Melville, 1991 | Online Research Library: Questia

Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile by Herman Melville, 1991 | Online Research Library: Questia

Call me Frank

Mid-1850's Melville riffs on "frank" as name and character-trait:

“Thank you for your frankness,” said Paul; “frank myself, I love to deal with a frank man. You, Doctor Franklin, are true and deep, and so you are frank.”

The sage sedately smiled, a queer incredulity just lurking in the corner of his mouth.

-- Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile (1855); first printed in Putnam's Monthly Magazine - September 1854

Paul's genuine frankness contrasts with the more calculating and ambiguous behavior displayed by Benjamin Franklin. Hennig Cohen has noted how Melville's wordplay on the "frank" in Franklin looks forward to the ironic naming of Frank Goodman, the confidence-man's confidence man: 

99.9-11 frankness . . . frank man . . . Franklin . . . frank 
Paul Jones appears to be nothing if not frank, though Franklin, who appears at times to be less so, listens to his words with a lurking "incredulity" (99.12). Melville is once more turning to account the suggestiveness of a personal name. He is also anticipating the significant name, Frank Goodman, of The Confidence-Man (Chap. 29) who at times seems less than frank.

-- Annotations to Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile, edited by Hennig Cohen (Fordham University Press, 1991) page 395.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Hennig Cohen on The Rebellion Record and Battle-Pieces


From the Introduction by Hennig Cohen in his 1963 edition of Battle-Pieces:
The ingredients of Battle-Pieces, ranging as they did from a Renaissance portrait to participation in a cavalry raid, were diverse in the extreme but scarcely representative of what Melville called the "varied amplitude" of the war. Much had to be filled in. Impressions wanted corroboration, and realistic detail was needed. Hence, as he had done on previous occasions, Melville sought a book which would help him flesh out impressions, which would assist him in seeing his object whole, and which would contribute a degree of order. He found such a book in The Rebellion Record. Despite Melville's statement in his introductory note that he served as a "harp in the window, and noted the contrasted airs which wayward winds have played," the poems are frequently specific, detailed, and selective in terms of subject. They were not often the product of white heat generated by immediacy, but rather of the cool calculation which the passage of time makes possible. 
The Rebellion Record was a periodical designed to present a history of the Civil War in "a digested and systematic shape," through selected newspaper accounts and official reports interspersed with verse and anecdotes. The material was cumulated in a series of eleven volumes and a supplement. Each volume contained a "Diary of Events," a section of "Documents and Narratives" and a section of "Poetry, Rumors and Incidents." On the whole the quality of the writing was adequate but prosaic, unpretentious except for the poems, which were of indifferent quality. The first eight volumes, covering the years 1860 to 1864, were available to Melville in time to have been of use to him for Battle-Pieces.  
There is no evidence that Melville owned a set of The Rebellion Record, but in his note to the poem, "Rebel Color-bearers at Shiloh," he states that the "incident upon which this piece is based is narrated in a newspaper account of the battle to be found in the 'Rebellion Record,'" and the quotation which he gives is accurate. "The Rebel Color-bearers at Shiloh" is, in the order of the poems in the volume, probably the last for which The Rebellion Record is a source. In all, Melville drew upon The Rebellion Record for at least twenty poems, a majority of those which deal with military events. Eighteen concern events before 1863, and of this number twelve contain material which can be traced to The Rebellion Record. Not only did Melville need The Rebellion Record for the nudge it gave his muse but he also depended upon it for raw facts, especially concerning the first years of the war, when his interest had been relatively slight, and which were then as much as five years in the past. 
The poem "Donelson," the longest of those for which he drew upon The Rebellion Record, reveals three principal ways in which Melville used the various newspaper dispatches and official reports in this compendium. For narrative purposes, he would follow closely a number of different sources, choosing facts and incidents and weaving them together with little embellishment or expansion. For intensifying drama or mood, he would take a single source and strip it to its essence. Finally, to suggest larger implications and relationships than narrative, drama, or mood alone could provide, he would use his source material as the starting point for a cluster of imagery weighted with moral significance.  
An example of diverse sources fused into a unified narrative is the account of the Thursday morning fight (lines 59ff.). Within some fifty lines Melville employs material from articles reprinted from the New York Times, Missouri Democrat, Charleston Courier, and Richmond Dispatch. He took items unique to a single newspaper and also information available in several. In the latter case it is sometimes hard to ascertain the exact source. Thus the Courier and the Dispatch report the use of distinctive arm bands to identify the tatterdemalion Confederate troops (lines 99-101), and only the Times notes a "great profusion of gold lace" worn by Confederate officers (line 104). Both the Times and the Missouri Democrat mention the expertise of the Federal sharpshooters (lines 82-83) and the death of Colonel Morrison (line 80), but only the Times describes the injuries caused by falling tree limbs which had been struck by artillery (line 78) or compares the Union riflemen to hunters at a salt lick in ambush for deer (lines 86-88). Melville took the description of Thursday night at Donelson (lines 136-51) from one newspaper, the Missouri Democrat, adhering to the order of the dispatch and echoing its language, but pruning and refining to create a sense of grim determination in the face of icy misery and danger. An extract from this account shows how closely he followed the original:
The night of Thursday will long be remembered by the troops surrounding Donelson. The weather. . .toward the close of the afternoon became chilly and lowering. About six o'clock a heavy rain set in. During the warmth of the day before . . . whole regiments had cast aside their overcoats and blankets, and without tents, and in a great majority of cases, occupying positions rendering a fire a sure mark for the enemy's batteries, with nothing to eat but cold rations, their condition was deplorable indeed. To add to their discomfort, when thoroughly saturated with rain, a pelting snow-storm set in, continuing all night. As can be imagined, with an enemy in front, continually annoying and annoyed, but little sleep was indulged in. The only demonstration of importance on the part of the rebels, during the night, was a formidable attempt on the right wing to obtain Taylor's battery....  But, cold and hungry, with garments stiff with frost, the soldiers were still hopeful and firm. . . . The universal sentiment was, as blunt Col. Oglesby expressed it, "We came here to take that fort, and we will take it. . . ." (See "Donelson," p. 51.) 
The passage in "Donelson" which describes the duel between the Union gunboats and the Confederate water batteries (lines 207-22) illustrates how Melville took a prosaic newspaper article, in this case from the New York Times of February 15, 1862 (Rebellion Record, IV, 172), and reworked it in such a way that it becomes not merely terse, effective narrative but narrative with moral significance. The newspaper account relates how the gunboat "Louisville" was damaged:
At this time the boats were within some four hundred yards, and were on the point of using grape-shot, when a shot disabled the steering apparatus of the Louisville, by carrying off the top of the wheelhouse, and knocking the wheel itself into fragments. There was a tiller aft, and this was instantly taken possession of by the pilot—but he had scarcely reached it, ere the rudder was carried away by a shot from the Tyler. Of course the boat became instantly unmanageable, and swung around, receiving a shot in the woodwork towards the stern, which, I believe, wounded several seamen. Under this circumstance, it was thought best to retire, and accordingly the whole fleet fell back to the position it had occupied in the morning. The most serious damage sustained during the action was from one of those monster one hundred and twenty-eight-pound shots, which passed through a bow-port of the Louisville and dismounted the second gun on the starboard quarter, killing three men and wounding six others. A captain of one of the guns was cut completely in two, and spattered his brains over Captain Dove, who stood by him, and otherwise so mangled him that scarcely a resemblance of humanity remained. (See "Donelson," p. 51 .)
For the "Louisville" passage Melville winnows out journalistic wordiness and compresses details; for example, the number of damaging shots which the vessel received is reduced to one. This increases the pace of the narrative and heightens the drama. Moreover, it provides a focal situation which may be invested with cosmic implications. The projectile from the Confederate battery is a planet, a malign and fateful wanderer in the skies. When it destroys the steering mechanism of the ship, the ship drifts uncontrolled, "lawless," itself useless and a danger to the fleet. The figurative language drawn from astronomy and the law underscores two ideas which recur in Battle-Pieces: the role of Fate in the lives of men and the need for mechanisms of control by individuals and society. 
A final point should be made about the way Melville used The Rebellion Record. In the deliberate choice of certain material Melville contributed to the thematic and structural unity of his book. I have suggested that opposition and reconciliation constitute the principal theme of Battle-Pieces. Melville's use of a sentence from the New York Times of February 17, 1862 is a minor but telling instance of the ramifications of this theme: "In some cases, a few of our wounded were cared for by the rebels, although they were without fire, and could give them but little valuable assistance." The sentence is the basis for this passage in "Donelson":
Some of the wounded in the wood
Were cared for by the foe last night,
Though he could do them little good,
Himself being all in shivering plight. (Lines 254-57) 
The function of this passage is to portray the universality of suffering and the compassion of the enemy. Melville's view that the Union was right on the issues of the war is quite clear. Du Pont's fleet "warred for the Right," Stonewall Jackson "Stoutly stood for wrong," and the defeat of the Confederacy was "Treason thrown." Therefore the use of an incident which reveals such a curious display of generosity raises questions. 
The explanation is that Melville took the first opportunity to speak out for compassion and humanity, the foundation, as he saw it, upon which the opposition of North and South could be reconciled. The irony of the war was rooted in the fact that men were dehumanized by the very ideas that they fought for. In order to attain a reconciliation, principles would have to be subordinated to individuals. Melville could make his point best by emphasizing individuals, common soldiers trapped in a common misery, and by playing down the abstract issues of a "war of Wrong and Right"—to quote the words of "Look-out Mountain." "Donelson" happens to be one of the more ambitious poems in Battle-Pieces and the first in the sequence to have as its subject a military engagement in which the Union was victorious. Hence Melville could afford the luxury of depicting the humanity of the foe.
The nature of the ingredients which went into the making of Battle-Pieces—the Bible, Milton, Shakespeare, personal experiences and impressions, paintings, the illustrated weeklies, newspaper articles and official reports from The Rebellion Record—indicates Melville's distance from the actual events of the war. This was not entirely a disadvantage. Melville had long been uneasy about his dependence upon personal experience, sensing a danger in "immediate literary success, in very young writers" (to quote from Pierre), because of his memories of the days of Typee and Omoo. Nor could "mere reading" of The Rebellion Record or anything else serve as a substitute. His solution was not the recording of a "rich and peculiar experience" nor the skillful retelling of a tale once told. Instead, in the best of the Battle-Pieces, he distilled the essence of the experiences of war, pointing out their symbolic significance, universal application, and complexity. At a distance Melville could see the lineaments of the fundamental.   
--Hennig Cohen, Introduction to The Battle-Pieces of Herman Melville pp.15-19

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Hancock and Grant in Harper's Weekly, May 28, 1864


Major-General Winfield Scott Hancock made the front cover of Harper's Weekly for May 28, 1864. Inside, Grant's portrait takes up the full page 340.
"The face of General GRANT, of whom we publish a portrait today, is itself a victory. Its fixed resolution is terrible."


Lieutenant-General Grant's look is gloomy and "terrible," not "cheering" like the picture Melville describes in his poem On the Photograph of a Corps Commander.

On the chances of success for the Army of the Potomac under the newly promoted Grant, the Harper's Weekly editors express satisfaction that
"Every soldier trusts his commander, and every commander the General-in-Chief. There is a unity which that army has never known, a confidence which is unprecedented."
In notes for the 1963 edition of Battle-Pieces, Hennig Cohen identified Winfield Scott Hancock as Melville's most likely Corps Commander and called attention to the May 28, 1864 issue of Harper's Weekly with the "heroic three-quarter-length portrait of Hancock as its cover illustration."

Related posts on Melvilliana:

Tuesday, May 27, 2014