Friday, February 7, 2025

Santa Claus in the Morristown, New Jersey Court-house on New Year's Eve, 1834

On New Year's Eve 1834 the enterprising ladies of St. Peter's Episcopal Church in Morristown, New Jersey hosted a fun holiday fair at the splendid "Court room" occupying half the second story of the now historic Morris County Courthouse. Jolly old St. Nicholas himself made a personal appearance, possibly the first ever witnessed at an organized public event. 

As reported beforehand in the Newark Daily Advertiser (December 18, 1834): 

Newark Daily Advertiser - December 18, 1834
via genealogybank.com
"The Ancient patron-saint of children, St. Nicholas, is announced to attend the Fair of the Ladies of the Morris Episcopal Church at the Court room on New Years eve."
Courtroom #1 - Morris County Courthouse
More details of the festivities in store had been shared in the Morristown Jerseyman on December 17, 1834. For any readers who might have been unfamiliar with St. Nicholas as midwinter gift-giver, the local newspaper gave his better known alias, "Santaclaas."

Morristown Jerseyman - December 17, 1834
via genealogybank.com

A Happy New Year. 

The Ladies of the Episcopal Society will give a Fair at the Court Room, on Wednesday, 31st inst. at 4 o'clock P. M. A profusion of refreshments will be provided, with a variety of toys, books, and articles suited for New Years Eve. It is expected that St. Nicholas, commonly called Santaclaas, will honor the meeting with his personal presence, in ... to purchase various articles to be ... to the stockings of good children.

Should the weather prove unfavorable, the Fair will be postponed to the [next?] fine day.

Of all the seasons, this is peculiarly ... as to good cheer, social habits ... cultivation of liberal sentiment. ...foregoing notice it seems that...will be united at the Court house...last evening of this year. ...hope to see our fellow citizens ...y [of any?] age and sex, party and...ing in that direction at the appointed hour.

The meeting deserves public patronage for this additional motive; that its pecuniary profit is destined to aid in purchasing a Parsonage for the Episcopal Church in this Town. 

Besides the usual fun and games and the big draw, Santa Claus, attendees could look forward to "a profusion of refreshments" and plenty of attractive books, toys, and other items suitable for gifting to friends and family members. Back then Santa happily delivered on New Year's Eve. Really "good children" might expect to find their stockings loaded with presents the next morning, on New Year's Day, instead of or in addition to Christmas morning. Profits from this particular event, as explained at the end of the published announcement in the Morristown Jerseyman (December 17, 1834), would be donated to the fund already established for building a parsonage at the Episcopal Church. 

Undeterred by the furious snowstorm in Morristown on the 29th of December, St. Nicholas aka "Santaclaas" did in fact make his scheduled court date on New Year's Eve, 1834. Independent verification of Santa's appearance is provided in the manuscript diary of a young visitor named Francis Prioleau Lee (1814-1847), then a student at General Theological Seminary (GTS) in New York City. Lee, age 20, had been staying at the famous Ford Mansion ("once the headquarters of Gen. Washington") as a guest of his classmate and best friend Alfred Edmund Ford (1808-1893), a grandson of its builder Colonel Jacob Ford, Jr. There at "the White house," as Lee called it, prep for the upcoming fest and fundraiser began the day after Christmas. Lee's considerable literary skills were enlisted in composing versified predictions or "fortunes" to be offered for sale as unique New Year's gifts.  
"Friday 26.  Rained again. I read Miss Hannah Moore's Memoirs, and a part of Mrs. Jameson's works. The evening we spent very pleasantly around the center table making poetical fortunes to be sold at the approaching fair."
Party business continued to occupy Lee as a guest in the Ford household, right up to fair-day.

Francis P. Lee Papers; Francis P. Lee Diary, 1833-1835
Special Collections Research Center, William & Mary Libraries

Wednesday 31. Spent the day in helping to make articles for the fair and in the evening went to attend it. It was held in the court room and under the auspices of a figure called St. Nicholas who was robed in fur, and dressed according to the description of Prof Moore in his poem. Here I met most of my friends and passed a very pleasant evening.

New Years day. Thursday. Ford and I went out in the sleigh and paid 17 or 18 calls and then dined on venison at his Brother's....

Francis P. Lee Papers, Mss. 65 L51. Francis P. Lee Diary, 1833-1835; Box: 11, Folder: 2. William and Mary Libraries, Special Collections Research Center. https://scrcguides.libraries.wm.edu/repositories/2/archival_objects/330840
Francis P. Lee's 1833-1835 diary is rich with intrinsic value as autobiography and cultural history. Quoted above, the entry for Wednesday, December 31, 1834 also provides strong documentary support for the traditional attribution of "A Visit from St. Nicholas" ("'Twas the night before Christmas....") to Lee's Hebrew teacher at GTS, Clement C. Moore. First published anonymously in the Troy, New York Sentinel on December 23, 1823, the now classic Christmas poem had already been linked to Moore in print, through a cagey and allusive statement in the same newspaper by Sentinel editor Orville L. Holley:
Santa Claus.--A few days since, the Editors of the N. Y. Courier, at the request of a lady, inserted some lines descriptive of one of the Christmas visits of that good old Dutch saint, St. Nicholas, and at the same time applied to our Albany neighbors for information as to the author. That information, we apprehend, the Albany editors cannot give. The lines were first published in this paper. They came to us from a manuscript copy in possession of a lady in this city. We have been given to understand that the author of them belongs, by birth and residence, to the city of New York, and that he is a gentleman of more merit as a scholar and a writer than many of more noisy pretensions. We republish the lines in a preceding column, just as they originally appeared, because we still think of them as at first, and for the satisfaction of our brethren of the Courier, one of whom, at least, is an Arcadian.

-- Troy Sentinel for January 20, 1829; accessible online via NYS Historic Newspapers.

Holley had not explicitly identified the poet by name, although his 1829 remarks did contain a fairly obvious pun on Moore's surname, ranking him as "a gentleman of more merit as a scholar and a writer" than other pretenders (likewise unnamed) and revealing him to be a New Yorker "by birth and residence." In print, "A Visit from St. Nicholas" would not be formally ascribed to Clement C. Moore until Moore himself submitted it along with three other poems to Charles Fenno Hoffman for inclusion in the New York Book of Poetry (New York: George Dearborn, 1837). However, as the private testimony of Francis P. Lee casually discloses, Moore's authorship of "The Night Before Christmas" was already known to Lee and presumably other of Moore's students, friends, and faculty colleagues at the General Theological Seminary. 

While a college student at William & Mary, Sandra D. Hayslette first discovered Lee's previously unknown reference to the Morristown appearance of Santa Claus, "dressed according to the description of Prof Moore in his poem." Hayslette is duly credited for this wonderful find by Stephen Nissenbaum in a note to chapter 4 (page 345 note 85) of The Battle for Christmas (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996). For Nissenbaum, the importance of Lee's diary account lay in its early observation (perhaps the earliest on record) of a living Santa impersonator. At the time, Nissenbaum was naturally unconcerned with defending Clement C. Moore in the authorship dispute that would be revived and rehashed a few years later by supposed Literary Forensics Expert Don Foster in the last chapter of Author Unknown (Henry Holt and Company, 2000). 

Overlooked by Moore's defenders as well as doubters in subsequent considerations of the authorship question, the manuscript diary of Francis P. Lee merits a closer inspection. My first aim, herein accomplished, was simply to find the thing. Nissenbaum in the back of the Battle for Christmas pointed me to the archive at GTS library. These days even getting there virtually feels something like that scene in National Lampoon's Vacation where Chevy Chase and fam finally arrive at Wally World.

The Keller Library building and collections are currently closed.

Fortunately, however, excellent support is available "through the GTS affiliation with Virginia Theological Seminary." Vincent Williams, User Services Librarian with the Bishop Payne Library at Virginia Theological Seminary kindly informed me that the cited material was not currently inventoried in the GTS library holdings and referred me back to William & Mary. For generous assistance with locating it there, finally, and with obtaining scanned images of its contents, I am grateful to Carolyn Wilson, Research Assistant; and Kaitlyn G. Weathers, Digitization Specialist with the Special Collections Research Center in Earl Gregg Swem Library, William & Mary Libraries. 

Here and now I can offer one correction and several words not supplied in the 1996 transcription by Stephen Nissenbaum: 
  • Correction: Diary and advance newspaper notices of the event agree, the date of Lee's visit to the fair in Morristown was definitely Wednesday, December 31, 1834. New Year's Eve 1834, not 1833.
  • Missing words: Ellipses in Nissenbaum's version indicate five omitted words: "in the court room and." Lee's word court in "court room" may have seemed difficult to decipher with confidence, and a strange place to put Santa Claus outside of Miracle on 34th Street. But court is right, as doubly confirmed in two different newspaper announcements, published in the Morristown Jerseyman on December 17, and the Newark Daily Advertiser on December 18, 1834. 
Numerous mentions of Clement C. Moore by name appear in the 1833-1835 manuscript diary of Francis P. Lee. Most of these (not counting the time Lee "missed Dr. Moore's" lecture on February 4, 1835) are short notations of studying and reciting Bible texts in Hebrew. Throughout the month of December 1834 (until the 23rd when Lee departed for Morristown with his "Chum" Alfred E. Ford) Lee briefly noted his coursework with Moore and other seminary professors including Bishop Benjamin T. Onderdonk, Bird Wilson, and Samuel H. Turner. For example:
  • On Wednesday, December 3rd Lee "Recited Law's letter to Hoadley to Bp Onderdonk for 1 hour, and Hebrew to Prof. Moore one more." 
  • One week later on the 10th Lee again recited from Law's Letters to Bishop Hoadley to Onderdonk and "Hebrew to Dr. Moore."
  • On December 11, 1834 Lee "Recited Hebrew to Prof. Moore."
Early in the New Year 1835, Lee visited Moore in person after tea with "Mrs. Turner" (Mary Esther Beach Turner, wife of GTS professor Samuel Hulbeart Turner). As Lee recorded on Tuesday, January 20, 1835:
"I next called Prof. Moore and took tea again here had some delightful music from his daughter Margaret talked about female writers &c."

Next day, Jan. 21, Lee "Studied a lesson in Hebrew for Dr. Moore." At the end of the month Lee specifically resolved "to study Hebrew with more devotion." On Sunday Feb. 1, 1835 he extended this pledge: 

"I am determined at all accounts to be more attentive to my duties. How will this resolution be regarded a week hence?"
On the following Sunday, February 8, 1834 Lee felt reasonably satisfied with his turnaround:
"The resolution recorded page 138 has been in some degree persevered in. I have risen early and have studied Hebrew, both of them hard duties for me."
The manuscript diary of Francis P. Lee offers a valuable record of his youthful friendships and flirtations; one long and often frustrating romantic infatuation; his reading of Shakespeare and popular works like the Memoirs of the Life and Correspondence of Mrs. Hannah Moore, Scott's Peveril of the Peak, and Bulwer-Lytton's The Last Days of Pompeii along with assigned Bible chapters, sermons, and other religious texts; some of his travels and adventures during breaks; bouts with "the blues" and endurance of occasionally debilitating physical illness. For many reasons, and from many perspectives, the whole volume will doubtless reward further study. Thanks again to all the fine librarians and staff persons at William & Mary, Earl Gregg Swem Library for access to digital copies that make this ongoing research possible.

Title: Francis P. Lee Papers; Francis P. Lee Diary, 1833-1835
Series 2: Acc. 2011.285 Addition, 1827-1933
Author: Francis P. Lee
Volume/Box: Box: 11, Folder: 2

For one more sample in closing, here below is an excerpt from Lee's diary entry on Saturday, February 7, 1835 recounting his experience of Shabbat services in nearby Manhattan synagogues. After consecutive days of hard study during the first week of February, Lee "was examined in Hebrew" on Friday, February 6th. On Saturday, February 7, 1835 Lee 

"... went with Babbit and Germain [classmates Pierre Teller Babbitt and Reuben I. Germain] to the Jewish Synagogue near foot of Canal St. large room with galleries around 3 sides. The fourth occupied by a semicircular enclosure, with a vail hung before it. This contains their different Rolls of Parchment highly ornamented, dressed in satin with silver knobs and bells. We soon became tired of the monotonous tone in which the reader cantillated, and went up to Crosby street, where there is another in a much superior style. Tho there were the same arrangement in both. both having in the middle of the Room a raised platform, square, railed, contained a reading desk. This was of the Ionic order. The galleries were appropriated to Females, and under them were long parallel pews for the spectators, leaving a wide space between them and the central enclosure. The ceremony of depositing the Law soon commenced. A procession was formed from the central enclosure, led by a man bearing the Scroll; they proceeded by a motion so slow as to be imperceptible, and all the while the congregation chaunted. The voices were very musical, and I think I never heard such wild thrilling sounds in my life. They ring in my ears yet. A young man gave me his book and I followed them as they sang. My mind was deeply impressed, and it made me melancholy to see this relic of what once was so grand."

Crosby Street Synagogue Exterior
via Congregation Shearith Israel

Related posts

Saturday, February 1, 2025

MOBY-DICK reviewed in the Richmond, Virginia WATCHMAN AND OBSERVER

Father Taylor, the sailors' preacher--from a photograph by J.W. Black, Boston
via The New York Public Library Digital Collections

As previously shown on Melvilliana, here

the Richmond Watchman and Observer for December 25, 1851 reprinted the opening section of James C. Welling's review of Moby-Dick in the Washington, DC National Intelligencer under the curiously incorrect heading, "How Saints are Made / by Herman Melville." 

Edited by the Reverend Benjamin Gildersleeve (1791-1875), the Watchman and Observer was a Presbyterian weekly newspaper then published in Richmond, Virginia. 

Two weeks before, the same newspaper had offered an insightful (though often negative) review of Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. Transcribed herein, this newly discovered item is not collected in Herman Melville: The Contemporary Reviews, edited by Brian Higgins and Hershel Parker (Cambridge University Press, 1995; paperback 2009). At pages 226-227 the Cambridge UP volume of Contemporary Reviews does give the review of Mardi: and a Voyage Thither that had appeared in the Watchman and Observer sometime "before 12 May 1849." 

Probably the most original insight about Moby-Dick in the Watchman and Observer review may be found in the closing comment on Father Mapple's memorable "sermon on Jonah," where the anonymous reviewer (Rev. Gildersleeve?) identifies Edward Thompson Taylor ("Father Taylor, the great sailor preacher of New England") as the likeliest real-life model for Melville's fictional chaplain. 

Richmond Watchman and Observer - December 11, 1851
via genealogybank.com
 
MOBY-DICK or the Whale, by Herman Melville
New York, Harper & Brothers 1851, 12 mo. pp. 635. Through Nash & Woodhouse.

This is one of Melville's wild books about the sea, presenting the same mad mixture of good and bad, genius and guiltiness, depravity of heart and brilliancy of head, that we find in his other works. He has a reckless, sailor-like way about him, sometimes beautiful in its genuine emotion, but oftener repulsive in its flippant and blasphemous disregard of holy things, yet attractive to many because of its novelty and freshness. This book may be called the biography of a whale, for such is Moby-Dick its hero. There is much information about the whale, and whaling operations, but mingled up with much that is wild, and irreverant, and the perusal of it will give no one any knowledge or amusement which he cannot have with less risk from other works on the same subject. Among other strange things in it is a sermon on Jonah, put into the lips of we presume Father Taylor, the great sailor preacher of New England.

-- Richmond Watchman and Observer, December 11, 1851. 

Related posts

James McCune Smith on Horace Greeley as Stubb, quoting from MOBY-DICK? or a frequently reprinted newspaper excerpt from chapter 61, "Stubb Kills a Whale"

 

Related posts

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

MOBY-DICK and other books by Herman Melville reviewed in the Charleston SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN ADVOCATE

Rev. W.M. Wightman D.D.
Ed. of the Southern Christian Advocate

Found just this morning in the ginormous newspaper archives on genealogybank.com among articles added within 1 month, assorted Melville mentions including this previously uncollected notice of Moby-Dick; Or the Whale in the Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate for December 12, 1851. Edited in 1840-1854 by William May Wightman, the Southern Christian Advocate was published in Charleston, South Carolina by designated clergy on behalf of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South

The notice of Moby-Dick in the Southern Christian Advocate of December 12, 1851 offers three sentences of admirably balanced and original commentary, followed by a paragraph copied (with a few omissions) from the favorable review by George Ripley in Harper's New Monthly Magazine Volume 4 (December 1851) page 137.

Southern Christian Advocate - December 12, 1851
via genealogybank.com

RECENT PUBLICATIONS. 

MOBY-DICK; Or the Whale. By Herman Melville, Author of Typee, etc. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1851. 

This last book of Melville's is a curiosity. At times playful as a kitten, then solemn as a preacher; now a touch of transcendental philosophy, then a dash of bold, thrilling narrative; by turns picturesque, poetical, sportive, and stern in the iron grip of deep reflection;--this sea-story seems to puzzle the critics. Some pronounce it a failure, others consider it the most successful of the author's productions. We copy a paragraph from the notice given in Harper's Magazine:--In the course of the narrative the habits of the whale are fully and ably described. Frequent graphic and instructive sketches of the fishery, of sea-life in a whaling vessel, and of the manners and customs of strange nations are interspersed with excellent effect among the thrilling scenes of the story. The various processes of procuring oil are explained with the minute, painstaking fidelity of a statistical record, contrasting strangely with the weird, phantom-like character of the plot, and of some of the leading personages who present a no less unearthly appearance than the witches in Macbeth. These sudden and decided transitions form a striking feature of the volume. To a less gifted author, they would inevitably have proved fatal. He has not only deftly avoided their dangers, but made them an element of great power. --For sale by J. W. Stoy, Agent.

Where the review in Harper's magazine printed "with excellent artistic effect" the Southern Christian Advocate has "with excellent effect," omitting the word artistic. Also omitted, one sentence that came before the last one quoted in the Charleston notice: "Difficult of management in the highest degree, they are wrought with consummate skill." One result of these particular omissions could be to slight or subtly undermine the original emphasis on Melville's craftsmanship as a writer. On the other hand, the point may have been regarded as redundant and the omitted words cut mainly to save space. 

As a "bold, thrilling narrative" Melville's book evidently made a lasting impression on the editor, Rev. W. M. Wightman. In June of the following year, the Charleston Southern Christian Advocate reprinted the popular excerpt from Moby-Dick Chapter 61: Stubb Kills a Whale under the heading, "THE DEATH OF A WHALE." Correctly attributed at the end of the excerpt, in italics, to "— Herman Melville." 

Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate
June 11, 1852
Of the 20+ newspaper excerpts from chapter 61 that we know about, only this one in the Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate printed "...grinning furies" where the English and American first editions both had Stubb saying, "...grinning devils." In imagination, you could join the chase with Stubb and Tashtego, and even witness the horrible slaughter of the whale at the end of it, but you would not be exposed in the Southern Christian Advocate to the word devils as Melville used it in Stubb's exhortation to the crew of his whaleboat--too close to swearing, apparently. This was, after all, an official publication of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. Still, although this version loses the alliteration between death and devils, grinning furies will do.

Early in September 1852, the Southern Christian Advocate weighed Melville's next book after Moby-Dick and found it wanting. 

Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate
September 3, 1852
PIERRE: Or the Ambiguities. By Herman Melville. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1852.

Whatever else may be ambiguous, it is clear enough that every reader of this last book of Mr. Melville, will vote it perfect trash

Previously on Wightman's watch, Melville had received much friendlier mentions in the Charleston Southern Christian Advocate, including mostly positive notices of Omoo on May 28, 1847; and White-Jacket on April 12, 1850.

***
OMOO: A narrative of adventures in the South Seas. By Herman Melville, Author of "Typee." Complete in two parts. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1847. 

This work is the production of no ordinary mind. The narrative is as deeply interesting as the style is brilliant. We are sorry the author gives so unfavourable an account upon the whole, of the South Sea Island missions. Yet there is a tone of exaggeration, an air of romance pervading the book, which induces the reader to take, with many grains of allowance, what is said respecting missionary operations. The author's account of Tahiti, and of Queen Pomaree, possesses singular interest. His sea-scenes are sketched with the precision and force of Cooper, and an Irving-like charm pervades his descriptions of Island life. For sale by J. W. Stoy, 50cts. a volume

-- Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate for May 28, 1847.

*** 

Charleston, SC Southern Christian Advocate 
April 12, 1850 via genealogybank.com
WHITE-JACKET: Or the world in a Man-of-War. By Herman Melville, Author of Typee, etc. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1850.

Mr. Melville is getting to be a voluminous writer. In this work he gives us his man-of-war experiences and observations during a year's service on board of a United States frigate as an ordinary seaman. Life in the naval service was never more graphically drawn; nor ever, we may add, has the romance been more completely cut out of the thing. Talk of slavery! the articles of war will tell you what it is:--of despotism! and "Capt. Claret" is its personification. Distant seems the day when nations shall have no use for the war-ship. Heaven speed the time:--but really the work of the world's conversion to the peaceable principles and spirit of the gospel, appears to be hardly begun.

-- Charleston Southern Christian Advocate for April 12, 1850. 

As best I can tell, the four book notices identified herein (of Omoo, White-Jacket, Moby-Dick, and Pierre) are all new finds; none is collected in Herman Melville: The Contemporary Reviews, edited by Brian Higgins and Hershel Parker (Cambridge University Press, 1995; paperback 2009). Now I have to add the Southern Christian Advocate notice to the inventory of Moby-Dick reviews in 1851-1852. Favorable or Mixed? The choice to quote from the laudatory Harper's review accentuates the positive, for sure. However, Rev. Wightman's notice begins with such an explicit recognition of dramatically different critical responses, it practically begs to be counted with the honorable undecideds. 

So be it! 👍👎

Related post

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

"Melville's best": Mobby-Dick noticed in the New York FARMER AND MECHANIC

Here's something new and wonderful in its way, a previously unrecorded notice of Moby-Dick in the New York Farmer and Mechanic for November 29, 1851. This item is not in Herman Melville: The Contemporary Reviews, edited by Brian Higgins and Hershel Parker (Cambridge University Press, 1995; paperback 2009) although the "Checklist of Additional Reviews" there on page 291 does include the notice of Redburn published in the Farmer and Mechanic on November 29, 1849. 

New York Farmer and Mechanic - November 29, 1849

The Redburn item is transcribed by Richard E. Winslow III in "Contemporary Notice of Melville at Home and Abroad," Melville Society Extracts 106 (September 1996) pages 1-11 at page 6.

Published weekly in New York City, the New York Farmer and Mechanic was edited by William Holt Starr (1808-1884), better known today for his previous acquaintance with Edgar A. Poe in connection with the Broadway Journal. About Starr, see the recent note by Jeffrey A. Savoye, "More on 'A Forgotten Recollection' ” in The Edgar Allan Poe Review (2024) 25 (2): 220–221. <https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.25.2.0220>

In January of 1851 "W. H. Starr" was listed alone on the masthead as sole "Editor and Proprietor" of the Farmer and Mechanic. When the favorable notice of Moby-Dick (misspelled "Mobby-Dick," twice) appeared in the Farmer and Mechanic, re-titled Farmer and Mechanic and American Cabinet, the masthead named O. F. Parker as Publisher and Associate Editor. William H. Starr was by then identified only as Editor; and former "Traveling Correspondent" E. P. Whitmore as another Associate Editor. In 1847 the journal had been co-edited by Starr with John Milton Stearns (1810-1898). 

Transcribed below, the endorsement of "MOBBY-DICK" in the New York Farmer and Mechanic (Saturday, November 29, 1851) appeared third in a group of six "Literary Notices" (or seven, counting the short promo at the end for popular sheet music), all positive: after notices of the American Muck Book by D. J. Browne and Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Thomas Chalmers; before the notice of London Labor and the London Poor by Henry Mayhew and brief remarks on Appleton's Mechanics' Magazine, and the London Horticulturist for November.

LITERARY NOTICES.

 ... MOBBY-DICK; or The Whale, by Herman Melville. Harper & Brothers. This book, is beyond all question, Herman Melville's best. It might be called the "Whaliad" or the history of the whale. At all events it is the first work that ever laid bare the form, size, and habits of the great leviathan, and gave the reader an insight into all the art and mystery of whale fishing. Mr. Melville has interwoven his experiences into the form of fiction, wherein the celebrated whale "Mobby-Dick" and a Nantucket captain are the pivots, and he traverses every ocean, in the true style of a sea sportsman. The author's heart, soul, and stomach are in the business; his legs, arms, eyes, muscles and mind. The details of the whale hunts, the dangers, fatal accidents, and the character of the hunters, render it altogether, not only the most entertaining, but really the most useful book that we have had for many a day.  

-- New York Farmer, Mechanic, and Cabinet, November 29, 1851

I will add this now to the inventory of 1851-2 reviews of Moby-Dick, posted on Melvilliana here:

Saturday, January 11, 2025

Mr. Whipple, the Reviewer for GRAHAM'S MAGAZINE, 1849-1853


Graham's Magazine
for April 1853 offered a long and extremely favorable tribute to Edwin Percy Whipple, highly esteemed at the time as a leading American critic, essayist, and lecturer. 
Signed "J.G.D." (who's that?), the article is so full of extravagant praise, I could not help wondering if some of it was meant to be understood as satire. Reading again, allowing plenty of room for hyperbole, I take the writer to be fairly and squarely in Mr. Whipple's corner. Nonetheless, the style of writing displays a Melvillean delight in the play of language and use of literary and rhetorical devices (assonance and alliteration, bathos, antithesis, puns, innumerable allusions) for ironic or comic effects. However you regard the lionizing of E. P. Whipple in the April 1853 issue of Graham's, HERMAN MELVILLE is already in the house--thanks to "J. G. D." the author, who prefaces the article with an epigraph borrowed from the "Pleasant Shady Talk" of Melville's devil-possessed philosopher Babbalanja in the second volume of Mardi: and a Voyage Thither (1849):


EDWIN PERCY WHIPPLE.  

"The [True] critics are more rare than true poets. A great critic is a sultan among satraps; but pretenders are thick as ants striving to scale a palm after its aerial sweetness." — HERMAN MELVILLE.

From the jump then, "J. G. D." self-identifies as a genuine Melville aficionado. A fan even of Mardi❣ ❣❣ With this rarest of quotes for an epigraph, the claim for the greatness of Mr. Whipple as a literary critic will be argued in light of Melville's pronouncement on the scarcity of sultanic "true critics," as opposed to the plenitude of pretenders. This, in Melville's lofty palm of a book which the pretentious ant-critics had striven mightily to scale, and hate on. Outside of Mardi itself, the chosen quotation appears nowhere else in the gigantic digitized collection of searchable works at HathiTrust Digital Library until 1921, when Raymond M. Weaver used it in the landmark biography Herman Melville, Mariner and Mystic (New York: George H. Doran Company). 

Now for a sample of the author's entertaining prose style, at once bluff yet abundantly expressive, being rich in creative word choices, metaphors and conceits: 

  • Mr. Whipple "is all free from the supple superciliousness and the common cant, strut, swagger, twaddle, and conceit of reviewing." (page 448)
  • Interesting military metaphor here--bordering on astronomy, as in Dupont's Round Fight, one of Melville's Civil War poems in Battle-Pieces: "None of his faculties ever sally out foraging or frolicking on their own account, but are all marshaled in orderly array, and move together in unity." (448)
  • "Between the motion of Mr. Whipple's thoughts and those of most men, there is about the same difference as between the movements of a catamount and a caterpillar." (449)
  • Whipple's brand of criticism "gives no quarter to vapid and pithless pretension, overweening fatuity, genteel immorality, saint-seeming hypocrisy, or silly slim flimsiness; he especially whips all vulgar elegant idlers and foul fools, all wanton literary aggressors--whether they carry a pike against a man, or only a pique--" (450)
  • "neat as a nut" (450)
  • "to stir a saint... or tickle a cultivated sinner" (451)
  • "He is neither a mystic nor a worldling...." (451)
  • "earnest as an ancient prophet, and sharp as a pick-pocket.” (451)
  • "True genius is the transfiguration of common sense, and not the annihilation of it." (452)

Late in the article, "J.G.D." scorns the "intense inanity" exhibited in the patronizing London Athenæum review (November 22, 1851) of Whipple's collected lectures on Literature and Life (Boston, 1850):

"It is very questionable whether blind noodles, boobies and snobs are the fit persons to judge of works of genius;--and the London Athenæum, if that be a fair sample of its literary verdicts, may safely be set down as a remarkably owly concern."

This deliciously worded dismissal of "literary verdicts," plural, handed down by transatlantic "noodles,  boobies and snobs," also plural, might easily be applied to the influentially bad review of The Whale as "an ill-compounded mixture of romance and matter-of-fact," published the month before in the same English journal.

To be sure, the excessive, zestful, over-the-top style adopted by "J. G. D." is not suited to everybody's taste. One fellow-journalist in Philadelphia complained of the "rhapsody of adjectives" loosed in the "High Falutin" tribute to Mr. Whipple. 

Pennsylvania Freeman - April 7, 1853
"HIGH FALUTIN." -- A writer in the last number of Graham's Magazine, goes into a rhapsody of adjectives, over the merits of Mr. Edwin P. Whipple. Here are specimens: 
"His integral character, the vast but facile and benign power of his nature," has hitherto received but a "slim appreciation." He has an "ethereal, colossal, and commanding intellect,--a sturdy, circumspective, foresightful, spirit-piercing sagacity;" and as a "lucid and reliable, racy and candid and decisive" "interpretative critic," he is "the most obviously excellent and most widely known." His style is "most affluent, clear, terse, plastic, pictorial, philologically perfect, and correct to a comma."

There; that is enough for our readers at once. We pity those who have to take the whole at one dose.  -- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Freeman, April 7, 1853
But hold up. Can it really be, that this sultan of 19th century lit crit never said a mumbling word in public about any work by Herman Melville? Come to think about it, how in the world could "J. G. D." have endorsed Mr. Whipple so effusively and exclusively, indulging in such a "rhapsody of adjectives," if said Mr. Whipple had never stooped to review Melville's Mardi, that portentous allegory from which the singularly rare epigraph to the article on "Edwin Percy Whipple" derives? 

As Hugh Hetherington harrumphed in a footnote to Melville's Reviewers: British and American, 1846-1891 (University of North Carolina Press, 1961), with explicit reference to the praise for Whipple's superior "intellect" in the 1853 article in Graham's,
"This great mind does not seem to have shown any awareness of the existence of Melville." (Melville's Reviewers, page 9)

In stark contrast to the seemingly indifferent Mr. Whipple of Boston with his presumed neglect of Melville's genius, Hetherington proposes Bayard Taylor as the "real Melville enthusiast" who penned the remarkably sympathetic reviews in Graham's Magazine of Mardi (June 1849) and Redburn (January 1850).

Hetherington's conjectural assignment of these two reviews in Graham's to Bayard Taylor would not be adopted in subsequent collections of Melville reviews. Although Bayard Taylor did serve briefly as nominal editor of Graham's and continued to submit occasional pieces, the contributions of Taylor and other big-name authors were credited to attract more readers and hopefully increase sales of the magazine. Hetherington's chief authority for information about Graham's is Frank Luther Mott, A History of American Magazines, 1741-1850 (New York, 1930). The first volume of Mott's History incorporates findings published in his earlier study, A Brief History of 'Graham's Magazine'.

  • Mott, Frank Luther. “A Brief History of ‘Graham’s Magazine.’” Studies in Philology, vol. 25, no. 3, 1928, pp. 362–74. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4172007. Accessed 10 Jan. 2025.

Mott emphasized the limited role of Taylor who even in 1848 "was never more than a contributing editor." Also in the earlier study, Mott placed Mr. Whipple in the corps of regular contributors to Graham's, as reorganized in 1849-1850: "Edwin P. Whipple wrote articles and reviews." 

Boston Evening Transcript - August 20, 1850
via newspapers.com
Whipple's role as "the Reviewer" for Graham's magazine in this period was openly acknowledged in a newspaper article first published in the Oswego NY Commercial Times and reprinted in several Massachusetts newspapers. (Published in Oswego, New York by James N. Brown, the Commercial Times on November 26, 1851 plugged Moby-Dick as a "welcome" new book, "written with considerable spirit" and loaded with "wit and humor.") The earliest reprinting of "MR WHIPPLE, THE REVIEWER" I have found so far appeared under that heading in the Boston Evening Transcript of August 20, 1850. 

Boston Emancipator & Republican - August 29, 1850
via genealogybank.com
Possibly Whipple himself had supplied a good deal of useful information about his life and literary career to the anonymous writer of "Mr. Whipple, the Reviewer." Some of the same biographical details are disclosed in extant letters from Whipple to Rufus W. Griswold, accessible online via Digital Commonwealth. As stated in the unsigned newspaper article, the recent two-volume collection of Whipple's Essays and Reviews (New York: D. Appleton, 1850) reprinted many pieces that had originally appeared in the prestigious Boston quarterly, the North American Review. Also just out at the time, the aforementioned volume of Whipple's Lectures on Subjects Connected with Literature and Life (Boston: Ticknor, Reed, and Fields, 1850), the English reprint of which would get ridiculously undervalued according to "J.G.D." by condescending twits ("blind noodles, boobies and snobs") at the London Athenæum

Salem, Mass. Register - September 15, 1850
via genealogybank.com
What's new, and crucial for the investigation now underway, is the public acknowledgement of Mr. Whipple's generally unheralded work for George Rex Graham of Philadelphia:
"For several years past, the Critical Notices in Graham's Magazine, have been written by Mr. Whipple. He dispatches this description of writing with astonishing facility, entire faithfulness, and unerring judgment."
A bit more casually, the National Era listed the unsigned "critical Notices by Mr. Whipple" among "especially commendable" highlights in the August 1850 issue of Graham's Magazine, alongside credited contributions of a poem by Bayard Taylor and a short story by Caroline Chesebro. In this issue Whipple had also contributed the long essay on Wordsworth over the initial "P." for his middle name, Percy. Presumably when speaking of unspecified, plural "critical notices" the Washington, D.C. National Era editor refers to the section near the end of each monthly installment in Graham's, usually titled "Review of New Books."
Washington, D. C. National Era - August 8, 1850
By 1850, according to the promotional newspaper item featuring "Mr. Whipple the Reviewer," Whipple had obtained at least two years of experience in the role of reviewer at Graham's, having "for several years past" been responsible for producing "the Critical Notices in Graham's Magazine." 

Writing from Boston on April 26, 1847 about his slot in the proposed volume on the Prose Writers of America, Whipple modestly instructed editor Rufus W. Griswold to 

"leave out of your notice of me, all biographical matter except the time when and the place where I was born, and the fact that I am engaged in Commercial pursuits. Cut out likewise the tremendous puff about my style being Milton and Addison fused together."
I'm guessing Griswold had little time to oblige these requests even if he wanted to. At any rate, Whipple still comes last in the published arrangement of authors, against his wishes. And Griswold's fulsome intro still includes the biographical tidbits and this "tremendous puff" that Whipple asked to be dropped:

"Though he is no copyist, some of his articles suggest a fusion of the strength of the Aeropagitica with the ease and liveliness of the Spectator."

At the close of the same letter Whipple chastised Griswold for his "shabby genteel damnation" of Cornelius Mathews. Good heavens! too bad Perry Miller did not have this passage to enrich his classic study The Raven and the Whale (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1956):

I am glad to hear that you are well. I am sorry that Duyckinck published that article in the World. It is very one-sided and harsh. However you drew down the lightning on your own head by your shabby genteel damnation of Mathews. I always make it a rule never to join in when there is a cry of condemnation against a fellow creature and author. Mathews has not had justice done him, and therefore he is to be tenderly touched. You may depend upon it that his influence across the water will be against you if you do not modify your criticism upon him. I wish you would take out some of the eulogy on me and put it on to Cornelius. You would not, in that case, increase the aggregate of your praise. 

-- Edwin Percy Whipple, Boston, MA., autograph letter signed to R. W. Griswold, 26 April 1847. < >

Besides the 1850 newspaper item already cited herein, additional evidence of Whipple's role as the Reviewer for Graham's can be found in his extant letter to R. W. Griswold of January 6, 1849 (misdated 1848 by Whipple, writing early in the first month of the New Year 1849).

"I have not yet had time to scrutinise your last books, Sacred and American. They look very well, and the Female Poets, especially, has amazed me by its research. I shall notice both in Graham's.

I am glad you like the Essays and Reviews. I see that they are beginning to blackguard me in New-York; and in Phila. I have been treated very shabbily. They seem to be apprehensive that the book will prove interesting to the public." 
-- Edwin Percy Whipple, Boston, MA., autograph letter signed to R. W. Griswold, 6 January 1849. Boston Public Library, Rufus W. Griswold Papers, 1834-1857. Accessible online via <>

Whipple refers here in a kind of shorthand form to just-published anthologies edited by Griswold, The Sacred Poets of England and America and The Female Poets of America. Fulfilling Whipple's written promise to Griswold in January, the Review of New Books department in the March 1849 issue of Graham's (now going as Graham's American Monthly Magazine of Literature and Art) included substantial, favorable notices of both new books. 

Graham's American Monthly Magazine - March 1849

🎆🎇

Strongly confirming the identity of Mr. Whipple as the author of anonymous critical notices in Graham's, only three months before the appreciative take on Melville's third book Mardi: and a Voyage Thither graced page 385 of the June 1849 issue.  

🎇🎆

Graham's American Monthly Magazine - June 1849

Therefore, the Graham's reviewer of Mardi (and Redburn, too) who impressed Hugh W. Hetherington as a "real Melville enthusiast" was not Bayard Taylor, but Edwin Percy Whipple.

Mopping up, we may as well credit Mr. Whipple, verified reviewer at Graham's Magazine, with subsequent notices there of Mobby-Dick; or the Whale (with Moby misspelled Mobby in February 1852) and Pierre; or the Ambiguities (October 1852). Well, it's not so much of a stretch, after all. As long known in Hawthorne scholarship, Edwin Percy Whipple also wrote friendly reviews of Hawthorne's works in Graham's: of The Scarlet Letter in May 1850; The House of the Seven Gables in June 1851; The Snow Image in April 1852; The Blithedale Romance in September 1852; and Tanglewood Tales in September 1853. These items are all inventoried by Gary Scharnhorst in Nathaniel Hawthorne: An Annotated Bibliography of Comment and Criticism before 1900 (Metuchen, N. J., & London: The Scarecrow Press, 1988) and ascribed there to Edwin Percy Whipple.

Whipple's tenure at Graham's extended from 1849 to 1853, according to William Charvat in The Profession of Authorship in America, 1800-1870, edited by Matthew J. Broccoli (Ohio State University Press, 1968). Focused mainly on the genial influence of Whipple's old friend James T. Fields, Charvat portrays the Graham's reviewer as
"...an irresistible object of the celebrated charms of James Fields. who saw to it that Whipple met, and remained in permanent social relations with, as many Ticknor and Fields authors as possible. It is not surprising that these were the subject of a majority of Whipple's unsigned reviews in Graham's between 1849 and 1853" (Profession of Authorship, page 177).
More work remains to be done, of course. I don't automatically suppose Whipple wrote the positive notice of Typee in the May 1846 number of Graham's. Then again, our man allegedly began contributing to newspapers and magazines at the age of fourteen, so who knows? Born March 8, 1819 (five months before the birth of Herman Melville on August 1st of the same year), Edwin Percy Whipple turned 15 in 1834. By the time Melville published his first book. Whipple had already made a name for himself as a reviewer to be reckoned with. Positive identification of Mr. Whipple as sympathetic reviewer of Mardi, Redburn, Moby-Dick, and--recognizing exceptional "force and subtlety of thinking and unity of purpose" in scenes "wrought out with great splendor and vigor"--of Pierre as well, invites further study of Whipple's writings. 
At first glance a number of Whipple's favorite subjects and themes emerge in the four Melville reviews published during his tenure as the writer of critical notices for Graham's Magazine, particularly his interest in revelations of a writer's mind or "mentality," of peculiar traits or signs of personal "individuality," and evidence of spirit and original genius.

Sad to say, I have yet to answer the question I started with. Who is "J. G. D."? Inquiring minds etc.

Links to some available bios of Edwin Percy Whipple