Showing posts with label F. L. Lucas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F. L. Lucas. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2021

F. L. Lucas on BATTLE-PIECES

Frank Laurence Lucas, 2Lt, 7th Battalion, Royal West Kent Regiment, 1914
Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

"... Here ["Sheridan's Ride" in Battle-Pieces and "Far Off-Shore" in John Marr] is an ear, and a far from unhappy boldness; further, whatever Melville's literary decay, the prose 'Supplement to the Battle Pieces,' in which he rams a little sense down the throats of the type of fool, common then as now, who professed moral indignation because the beaten enemy 'showed no penitence,' does prove that his sense and his humanity remained as sound as ever."

-- Authors Dead and Living, page 110.

Most of the chapter on Herman Melville in Authors Dead and Living by Frank Laurence Lucas originally appeared in The New Statesman (April 1, 1922), as a review of Raymond M. Weaver's biography Herman Melville, Mariner and Mystic. However, the comment quoted above on Melville's best verses, and the prose supplement to Battle-Pieces, did not appear in the New Statesman version.

Authors Dead and Living (London: Chatto & Windus, 1926) is digitized and accessible for borrowing on the great Internet Archive.
  • https://archive.org/details/authorsdeadlivin0000luca
Melville's writings are in the public domain, including the Civil War poems and prose supplement comprising Battle-Pieces and Aspects of The War (New York: Harper & Brothers,1866). 

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

One part genius to three parts melodramatic rant

Here and there are some essays on prose writers, including one on Herman Melville, whose “Moby Dick,” which is one part genius to three parts melodramatic rant, Mr. Lucas contrives vastly to over-estimate. 
-- J. B. Priestley, review of F. L. Lucas, Authors Dead and Living (London: Chatto & Windus, 1926) in the London Daily News, March 12, 1926. 

Literature and Western Man (Harper & Brothers, 1960) contains Priestley's longer, later take on Moby-Dick as accidentally good in places, more symbolical than allegorical. Excerpted on pages 271-272 in Moby-Dick as Doubloon, edited by Hershel Parker and Harrison Hayford (W. W. Norton & Company, 1970). As documented by Andrew N. Rubin, Orwell considered Priestley "very anti-USA." which would explain the enduring hostility to Melville and his glorious allegory of freedom.

Rubin, Andrew N., and أندرو روبين. “Orwell and Empire: Anti-Communism and the Globalization of Literature / أورويل والٳمبراطورية: مناهضة الشيوعية وعولمة الأدب.” Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, no. 28 (2008): 75–101. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27929796.

Authors Dead and Living by F. L. Lucas is digitized and accessible for borrowing on the great Internet Archive where you can read the chapter on Herman Melville and decide for yourself how far Lucas over or under-prized Moby-Dick.

https://archive.org/details/authorsdeadlivin0000luca/page/104/mode/2up